Of course we know nothing definite or precise with regard to the units
of the germ-plasm, and we cannot tell what is necessary in order
that a determinant shall determine a part of the developing body in
this way or in that; thus we have no definite idea of the relations
subsisting between the variations of the determinants and those of
their determinates, but we know at least so much, that hereditary
variation of a part is only possible when a corresponding particle
in the germ-plasm varies; and we may at least assume that these
correspond to each other so far, that a greater development of the one
implies a greater development of the other, and that a reversal of
these relations is impossible. If the determinant _X_ disappears from
the germ-plasm the determinate _X´_ disappears from the soma. It is
therefore justifiable to infer from the degree of development of an
organ the strength of its determinant, and to assume that plus- and
minus-variations in both are correspondingly large.
But in addition to the fluctuations in the equilibrium of the
germ-plasm which lie at the root of all hereditary variation, we have
to take into account something which we have already touched upon
briefly--the correlation of the determinants, the influencing of one
determinant by those round about it. I have spoken for the sake of
brevity of 'the determinant' of a part, although all the large and
more important parts must certainly be thought of as represented by
several or many, if not, indeed, by whole groups of determinants.
Although it is quite out of our power to follow the complex processes
of the mutual influences of the determinants upon each other, we can
say this at least, _that these influences must exist_, and we have
here a faint indication of what must occur in the case of spontaneous
variations within the germ-plasm. We must, in the first place, think
of the individual determinants as arranged in groups, so that, for
instance, the determinants of the right and left half of the body lie
together, and therefore are frequently affected together by influences
which cause variation, so that both vary in the same direction at
the same time. In point of fact, analogous deformities, such as
polydactylism of both right and left hands, and even of hands and feet
at once, do actually occur. That the right and left hands, the fore-
and hind-limbs, are represented in the germ by particular determinants,
may be inferred from their frequently different phyletic evolution into
different forms of hand and foot, e.g. into flipper and rudimentary
hind-leg in the whale, as well as from the cases of particulate
inheritance, which are rare, but which undoubtedly do occur, such
as when, in Man, there is a maternal blue eye on one side of the
head and a paternal brown eye on the other. But almost more striking
than the differences between these homologous or homotypic parts
are their points of resemblance, and these may probably be in part
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account