We see from this example that it is not some inward necessity which
thus, in the higher and more complicated organism, contracts the
ontogeny into the embryonic state, but that this depends upon external
adaptive factors. Here again we have adaptation, mainly to the
conditions of larval life. The elimination of the larvæ by enemies,
for instance, will, other things being equal, be so much the more
incisive the longer the larval development is protracted, but in that
case the general ratio of elimination of the species, and the degree
of fertility the species must possess in order to hold its own in the
struggle for existence, will also play a part in determining the mode
of development. For the higher the ratio of elimination the more eggs
the female must produce, and the more eggs that have to be produced the
smaller will be the quantity of nutritive material for the building
up of the young embryo which each egg can be furnished with. I know
of no records in regard to the eggs of that Brazilian shrimp in which
embryonic development ends with the nauplius stage, but we shall
certainly not be wrong in predicting that the eggs in this case will be
very small and very numerous, in contrast to those of the freshwater
crayfish, which are large and, as compared with others known to us, not
very numerous.
It is a point of undeniable theoretical significance which the
life-histories of these Crustaceans disclose, that embryogenesis is
not condensed according to hidden internal laws when the structure
increases in complexity, but that the condensation of the ontogenetic
stages depends upon adaptation, and may be quite different in nearly
related species. It shows us anew that all biological occurrences are
dominated by the process of selection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account