When sixteen years ago I first inquired into the actual and ultimate
significance of sexual reproduction, I thought I had found it in
this ceaseless production of new individualities. This seemed to me
a sufficient reason for the introduction of amphimixis into nature,
since the difference between individuals is the basis of the process
of selection, and thus the basis of all the transformations of
organisms, which we may refer to natural or sexual selection. Now
these differences of selection-value are--as I believed then, and do
still--not only by far the most frequent organic changes, but also the
most important, since they not only initiate, but control new lines of
evolution. Therefore I still regard amphimixis as the means by which a
continual new combination of variations is effected a process without
which the evolution of this world of organisms so endlessly diverse in
form and so inconceivably complex, could not have taken place.
But I do not regard this amphimixis as the real root of variation
itself, for that must depend not on a mere exchange of ids, but rather
upon a variation of the ids. The ids of a worm of the primitive
world could not without variation now make up the germ-plasm of an
elephant, even if it be true that mammals are descended from worms.
The ids must have been meanwhile transformed times without number by
the modification, degeneration, and new formation of determinants.
Amphimixis, that is, the union of two germ-plasms, does not of itself
cause variation of the determinants, it only arranges the ids (the
ancestral plasms) in ever-new combinations. If the origin of variation
were limited to that alone, a transmutation of species and genera
would only be possible on a very limited scale; there could at most be
a narrow circle of variations, just as in the example already given
of the packs of cards; even if the taking away and mixing up of the
halves were repeated a thousand times, a definite though undoubtedly
large number of card-combinations would in the long run recur again and
again. But the case is different with the germ-plasm and amphimixis,
where there is an infinitely more varied series of results, because
the individual cards--the ids--are variable, even between one time of
sifting and shuffling and another, and therefore infinitely productive
of variety in the course of numerous repetitions of the shuffling.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account