A second group of facts, which indicates that old-established
characters have less tendency to overstep the limits of the neutral
'variation-playground,' is to be found in the experience of breeders,
and especially that of gardeners who have brought wild plants under
cultivation in order to procure varieties.
It has been proved that the wild plants often exhibit no hereditary
variations for a long series of generations, notwithstanding the
greatly altered conditions of life, but that then a moment comes in
which isolated variations crop up, which may then be intensified by
the manipulations of the breeder to form sport-species with large
conspicuously coloured flowers, or with some other distinctive
character. Darwin called this a shattering of the constitution of the
plant; but the stable and slowly varying 'constitution' simply means
that in old-established and well-adapted species the determinants
possess only a very restricted 'variation-playground,' and because of
their firmly based harmonious correlation are not easily and never very
quickly induced to overstep its limits in any marked degree.
Let us now apply all this to the institution of amphimixis and
amphigony, and it is immediately obvious that these determinants of the
germ-plasm which control the characters relating to sexual reproduction
must be _more stable and less variable than all others which a species
possesses, for they are infinitely older_. They are older than all
species-characters, older than the characters of the genus, of the
family, of the class, and indeed of the whole series or phylum to
which a higher animal, a vertebrate, for instance, belongs. We cannot
wonder, therefore, that amphigony has persisted through hundreds and
thousands of generations, even if it had not been reinforced in the
germ-plasm during this period by selection. We should rather wonder
that an institution so primaeval, and so firmly engrained in the
germ-plasm, can ever be departed from, even when its abandonment is to
the advantage of the species, as has happened in parthenogenesis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account