The reason of this is not difficult to discover; it lies in the
structure of multicellular animals, and in their differentiation
according to the principle of division of labour, for since only
particular cells are capable of reproduction, that is, of giving
rise to the whole, it is in these necessarily that the process of
amphimixis has to occur if its significance lies in its effects on the
succeeding generations. It is true that in the lowest multicellular
organisms, such as the species of _Volvox_, there are, in addition
to the sex-cells, other reproductive cells quite similar to the ova,
whose development into a new colony takes place without amphimixis,
but the higher we ascend in the animal and plant series the rarer are
these 'asexual' germ-cells or 'spores,' and in the highest animal types
they are entirely absent and reproduction occurs only by means of the
'sex-cells.'
I am inclined to look for the cause of this striking phenomenon mainly
in the fact that, if amphimixis had to be retained, this was effected
with increasingly great difficulty the more highly and complexly
differentiated the organisms became, and that more complicated
adaptations were therefore necessary in order that the union of the
two germ-cells might be rendered possible at all. There is first of
all the separation into two kinds of sex-cells, whose far-reaching
differentiations and precise adaptations to the most minute conditions
we have already discussed; then follow the innumerable adaptations
to bring about the meeting of the sex-cells, the arrangements for
copulation, and, finally, the instincts which draw the two sexes
together, the means of attraction which are employed, whether
decorative colours or attractive shapes, stimulating odours or musical
notes, in short, all the diverse and intricate arrangements, which
seem to be more subtly elaborated the higher the organism stands upon
the ladder of life. When we call to mind that sexual differentiations
finally go so far that they dominate the whole organism, alike in
its external appearance and in its internal nature, its feelings,
inclinations, instincts, its will and ability, as well as its structure
down to the finest nerve-elements, we can understand that a mode of
reproduction which demands such a composite disposition of details,
involving a moulding of the whole organism, so to speak, from birth
till death, must of necessity remain the only one, and that there
was no room for the persistence of any essentially different mode
of reproduction with quite different adaptations. Or, to speak
metaphorically, the power of adaptation which is innate in the organism
so exhausted itself in the establishment of this marvellous amphimixis
adjustment that the possibility of any other was totally excluded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account