From our point of view all this cannot surprise us, since all these
organisms, though only single cells, possess great complexity of
structure; we need only call to mind the extremely fine differentiation
of structure in numerous ciliated Infusorians, such as _Stentor_, which
has already been mentioned, or the bell-animalcule (_Vorticella_) with
its long and peculiarly ciliated gullet, its retractile ciliated disk,
its muscular or myophane layer, its spirally retractile stalk with the
ribbon-like, rapidly acting muscular axis; or the regular geometrically
constructed flinty skeleton of the Radiolarians, with their radially
disposed sword-like or rod-like needles and their complex interlacing
lattice-work shells. In the latter case the complexity of the living
substance becomes visible only through its product, the shell, for the
protoplasm itself does not show any visible intricacy, and the same is
true of the Coccidium whose life-history we have just been tracing,
for in each of its stages it seems to be of very simple organization,
though the succession of numerous different forms shows that its
germ-substance must be composed of numerous determinants.
We cannot doubt, however, that, in all unicellular organisms, the
protoplasm can be hardly less complicated as regards its minute
invisible structure, since otherwise it would be impossible that the
delicate vital processes which we observe in them should run their
course. In this I agree, at least in principle, with the beautiful
picture drawn by Ludwig Zehnder in his recent book[22] already
mentioned, though he reached it in quite a different way, namely,
by a purely synthetic method. He made the daring attempt to build
up the organic world from below, starting from atoms and molecules,
and ascending from these to the lowest vital units, our biophors, to
which he attributes a tubular shape and therefore calls fistellæ. He
imagines the cell to be made up of a large number, perhaps millions,
of different kinds of fistellæ, of which one presides over the power
of turgidity, another over endosmosis, a third over contraction, a
fourth over the conduction of stimuli, &c., so that there results a
high degree of cellular complexity, a composition out of numerous
kinds of biophors arranged on a definite architectural plan. All this
corresponds perfectly with the views I have so long championed, and
which alone make the existence of a nucleus intelligible, if it is
composed--as I assume--essentially of an accumulation of determinants,
that is, of hereditary substances. And that such a high degree
of complexity of structure is not a mere fanciful picture we see
occasionally even in the case of unicellular organisms. Thus, for
instance, in _Coccidium proprium_, parasitic in the newt (_Triton_),
the macrogamete or egg-cell (Fig. 123, _Ma_) before fertilization by
the sperm-cell or microgamete (Fig. 123, _Mi_) surrounds itself with a
capsule, at one pole of which a minute opening, the micropyle, remains
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account