But as to our question, In what organisms did amphimixis first arise,
and how? there seems, from what we have already learned with regard
to the Coccidia, little prospect of our being able to give a definite
answer, for if amphimixis occurs even in these lowly organisms, and
occurs, too, in the same manner as in the higher unicellular organisms,
and not very much more simply than among the highest multicellular
organisms, we may conclude that the preliminary stages will now be very
difficult or impossible to detect, either because they are extinct, or
because they occur only in ultra-microscopic organisms.
Nevertheless there do appear to be preliminary stages, and they are
exactly those which we should have assumed if we had been obliged to
construct them theoretically.
The first phenomenon of this kind is the mere juxtaposition of two or
more unicellular organisms, without the occurrence of fusion. This was
probably first observed by Gruber in Amœbæ, and it was theoretically
interpreted at a later date by Rhumbler. As many as fifty Amœbæ gather
together to form a 'nest,' and remain closely apposed to each other for
a fortnight. Although no fusion took place, and there were no visible
results of this juxtaposition, it may be concluded that the animals had
some sort of attractive effect upon each other, and it may be supposed
that some sort of advantage must have been associated with this state
of quiet, close apposition against one another. Cytotropism, the
mutual attraction of similar cells, which Wilhelm Roux first observed
in the segmentation-cells of the frog's egg, seems to occur also in
unicellular organisms, and this may help us to understand how a fusion
of cell-bodies may have come about.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account