former lecture, that at first the copulating cells were exactly alike
in appearance and size, that then one kind of cell became rather larger
than the other, and that only gametes which were thus different in size
were mutually attractive--the micro-gametes and the macro-gametes,
or male and female germ-cells; we have seen that these differences
between the two became more and more accentuated, that the female
cell continued to grow larger than the male, and to accumulate more
and more nutritive material for the building up of the young organism
which arises from its union with the male cell, and that the male cells
became smaller, but more numerous, as was essential if their chances of
finding the often remote female cell were not to disappear altogether.
And besides, there are all the innumerable adaptations of the egg-cell
to the countless special circumstances which obtain in the different
groups, and the innumerable varieties in the form of the sperm-cell,
with all its delicate and complicated adaptations to the special
conditions under which the egg-cell can be reached and fertilized in
this or that group of organisms. Of a truth, he is past helping who
does not regard with wonder and admiration the adaptations which have
been worked out in this connexion in the course of evolution! But if
all these details are adaptations, so is the beginning of the whole
process of differentiation; allogamy, the attraction of conjugating
cells of different lineage, is not a primary outcome of individual
diversity; gametes of different descent did not strongly attract each
other of themselves, but they were equipped with a strong power of
mutual attraction, because the union of very different individualities
was the more advantageous.
This is an important distinction, for the adaptation to allogamy is
widely distributed, and its latest manifestations have frequently
been misunderstood in the same way as its beginnings. The widespread
occurrence of allogamy has been interpreted as evidence in favour of
the rejuvenation theory, and the endeavour on Nature's part to secure
the union of the unlike has been associated with the hypothetical
'rejuvenating' power of amphimixis, and regarded as a direct and
inevitable outcome of this. That this view is erroneous we shall see
even more clearly from what follows.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account