[24] The cultures were begun in 1884 and are still continued (March 6,
1902), still multiplying as abundantly as at the outset. I reckon that
there are on an average five generations in a year, which means about
eighty generations in sixteen years.
But it may be asked, whence come the injurious results of inbreeding,
if not from the union of two nearly related germ-plasms? They certainly
do arise from that cause, but it is not through a 'formative stimulus,'
_too slight_ in this case, exercising a direct formative chemical
effect upon the two hereditary substances, but through the indirect
influences exerted by these _too similar_ hereditary contributions
during the development of the new individual. Lest it be imagined that
I am tilting against windmills, I will refer to one of the numerous
examples of the evil effects of inbreeding which have been submitted
to me as specially corroborative of the conception of amphimixis as a
'formative stimulus' whose strength depends upon the difference between
the germ-substances. The renowned breeder, Nathusius, allowed the
progeny of a sow of the large Yorkshire breed, imported from England
when with young, to reproduce by inbreeding for three generations. The
result was unfavourable, for the young were weakly in constitution
and were not prolific. One of the last female animals, for instance,
when paired with its own uncle--known to be fertile with sows of a
different breed--produced a litter of six, and a second litter of five
weakly piglings. But when Nathusius paired the same sow with a boar of
a small black breed, which boar had begotten seven to nine young when
paired with sows of his own breed, the sow of the large Yorkshire breed
produced in the first litter twenty-one and in the second eighteen
piglings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account