But how are we to understand the fact that pure parthenogenesis
may last through innumerable generations, and yet no degeneration
sets in? I believe very simply. In this case too, the same ids
which were peculiar to the mother of the race are contained in the
descendants, but they do not diminish in number, for in pure and
normal parthenogenesis, such as that of _Cypris reptans_, the second
maturation-division of the ovum does not take place, and this is
precisely the nuclear division which effects reduction. In addition,
the introduction of identical ids, which must take place in the case of
inbreeding at every amphimixis, does not occur, and, what is certainly
of great importance, all these cases are old species, living under
natural conditions--the same conditions under which they lived as
amphigonous species, and not newly formed breeds under artificial
conditions, as has probably always been the case in the experiments in
inbreeding.
It is true that even in old species, living in a state of nature,
unfavourable variations may arise in the germ-plasm, and may go on
increasing during purely parthenogenetic multiplication, for the ids
with unfavourably varying determinants will no longer be set aside
by means of reducing division. But those individuals in which the
unfavourable variational tendency increases until it has attained
selection-value will be subject to selection and will be gradually
eliminated; indeed, the weeding out of the inferior individuals will be
more drastic here than where amphigony obtains, because in this case
all the offspring of one mother are nearly alike, so that the whole
progeny is exterminated if the mother varies unfavourably.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account