But we should assuredly make a mistake if we were to regard the thick
fur of these apes as a direct reaction of the organism to the cold. We
see at once that this cannot be the case if we compare them with marine
mammals, which differ just as much from one another in this respect
and yet are exposed to the same low temperature. The whale and the
dolphin are quite naked, absolutely hairless, but the seals possess a
thick hairy coat. This striking difference is obviously connected with
the mode of life; the whales remain always in the water, the seals
leave it often and therefore require the hairy coat, especially in
colder climates, since otherwise they would be too rapidly cooled by
the evaporation of the water from their bodies. For the whales, on the
other hand, even a very thick hairy coat would not have sufficed as a
protection against cold, since water is a much better conductor of heat
than air, and so it was necessary for them to become enveloped with
the well-known thick layer of blubber, a deposit of fat lying under
the skin, and this--after it was once developed--made the hairy coat
superfluous, so that it disappeared. The seals certainly also possess
a layer of fat under the skin, but it is only in the largest of them
that it affords sufficient protection against the cooling effect of
evaporation when they go upon land or on the ice, and it is therefore
only in these larger ones that the hairy coat has markedly degenerated,
as, for instance, in the walrus and the sea-lion; in all the smaller
seals, in which the mass of the body is much less, the hairy coat is
necessarily very thick and protected from soaking by being very oily,
because the layer of fat under the skin would not be sufficient to
prevent excessive cooling when on land. But the thick coat of hair is
no more _produced_ by the cold than is the layer of fat. As Kükenthal
has shown, all these characters are adaptations, and may depend here as
elsewhere upon natural selection and upon the 'fluctuating' variations
of the germ-plasm upon which that process is based. They are directed
by personal selection because there is the need for them, and they are
produced and augmented by germinal selection.
In all these cases the _direct_ effect of external influences has
nothing to do with the matter, but in other cases that alone brings
about the whole change, which is then limited to the individual and
does not affect the species as a whole at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account