Experiments on mice also showed that the cutting off of the tail,
even when performed on both parents, does not bring about the
slightest diminution in the length of tail in the descendants. I
have myself instituted experiments of this kind, and carried them
out through twenty-two successive generations, without any positive
result. Corroborative results of these experiments on mice have
been communicated by Ritzema Bos and, independently, by Rosenthal,
and a corresponding series of experiments on rats, which these two
investigators carried out, yielded the same negative results.
When we remember that all the cases which have been brought forward in
support of an inheritance of mutilations refer to a _single_ injury
to one parent, while, in the experiments, the same mutilation was
inflicted on both parents through numerous generations, we must regard
these experiments as a proof that all earlier statements were based
either on a fallacy or on fortuitous coincidence. This conclusion is
confirmed by all that we know otherwise of the effects of oft-repeated
mutilations, as for instance the well-known mutilations and distortions
which many peoples have practised for long, sometimes inconceivably
long, ages on their children, especially circumcision, the breaking
of the incisors, the boring of holes in lip, ear, or nose, and so
forth. No child of any of these races has ever been brought into the
world with one of these marks: they have to be re-impressed on every
generation.
The experience of breeders agrees with this, and they therefore, as
Wilckens remarks, have long regarded the non-inheritance of mutilations
as an established fact. Thus there are breeds of sheep in which, for
purely practical reasons, the tails have been curtailed quite regularly
for about a century (Kühn); but no sheep with a stump-tail has ever
been born in this breed. This is all the more important because there
are other breeds of sheep (fat-rumped sheep) in which the lack of
the tail is a breed character; it is thus not the case that there is
anything in the intrinsic nature of the tail of the sheep to prevent
it becoming rudimentary. The artificially rounded ear of fox-terriers,
too, though cut for generations, never occurs hereditarily. Mr. Postans
of Eastbourne informs me that the cocks which are to be used for
cock-fighting are docked of their combs and wattles beforehand, and
that this had been done for at least a century, but that no fighting
cock without comb and wattles has been reared. In the same way various
breeds of dog, such as the spaniels, have had their tails cut to half
their length regularly and in both sexes for more than a century, yet
in this case there is no hereditary diminution of the length of tail.
Deformed stump-tails do indeed occur in most breeds of dog, but, as I
said before, their anatomical character is quite different from that of
artificially shortened tails, moreover they may occur in breeds whose
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account