It was Herbert Spencer, the English philosopher, who first brought
the argument of co-adaptation into the field against my view of the
non-inheritance of functionally acquired modifications. He pointed
out that many, if not, indeed, most modifications of bodily parts, to
be effective, implied further changes, often very numerous, in other
parts, and these latter must therefore have changed _simultaneously_
with the part which was being changed under the control of natural
selection; this, however, is only conceivable as due to an inheritance
of the changes caused by use, since a simultaneous alteration of so
many parts through natural selection would be impossible. If, for
instance, the antlers of our modern stag were to grow to the size of
those of the Giant Stag of the Irish peat-bogs, which measured over
ten feet across from tip to tip, this would mean--as has already been
shown--a simultaneous thickening of the skull, and to bear the heavy
burden, a strengthening of the _ligamentum nuchæ_, of the muscles of
the neck and back, of the bones of the legs and their muscles, and,
finally, of all the nerves supplying the muscles; and how could all
this happen simultaneously with, and in exact proportion to the growth
of the antlers, if it depended--as natural selection assumes--on chance
variations of all these parts? What if the appropriately favourable
variation in one of these organs did not occur? A harmonious variation
of all the parts--bones, muscles, nerves, ligaments--which unite in a
common activity, is an inadmissible assumption, because, in many cases,
such co-operating groups of organs have in the course of evolution
developed in opposite directions. In the giraffe, for instance, the
fore-legs are longer than the hind-legs, which is the reverse of what
obtains in the majority of ruminants; in the kangaroo the hind-legs,
on the contrary, have developed to a disproportionate size, while
the fore-legs have degenerated into relatively small grasping arms.
Co-operating parts, like the fore and hind limbs, may thus follow
opposite paths of evolution; their variations need not always be
directed to the same end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account