But much more complicated cases than this might be cited, if we were in
a position to estimate exactly the functional value of the individual
parts of the wing-venation in the different insects, for it is well
known that this venation serves the systematist as a basis for the
definition of genera, especially in Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera. That
is to say, it varies from genus to genus in a characteristic manner,
obviously corresponding to the differences in the wing-form, and in
the flight itself. But, unfortunately, we are still far from being
able to make more than quite general hypotheses as to the meaning of
the lengthening and strengthening, or conversely, the degeneration or
elimination, of this or that vein. From extreme cases, however, as for
instance the rich venation in good fliers with large wings, and the
scanty venation in poor fliers with small wings, we learn at least so
much, that the degree and even the manner of venation bears a definite
relation to the function of the wing, and this we might have assumed.
But these wing-veins, in as far as they serve as a support for the
weak wing-membrane, are purely chitinous structures, skeletal parts
which are not even renewed from time to time like the skeletal parts
of the leg and many other parts of the insect. As they are laid down
at first in the pupa as soft strings of cells, so they remain, and
they only begin to be used when they are completely hardened. _They
can therefore never have been caused to vary through use in the course
of the phyletic development of species and genera_, and the Lamarckian
principle can have no part in their transformations. But if they follow
the most subtle changes, which we cannot precisely demonstrate, of the
whole wing-surface and in the mode of flight, as a man is followed by
his shadow, there must be some other principle which adapts the organ
to its function, and which is able continually to adapt the large
number of individual wing-veins in the manner most advantageous for the
general function. Here, therefore, we have a state of matters exactly
corresponding to that obtaining in the transformation of actively
functioning parts which form a system with common co-operative action,
as, for instance, in the case we first discussed, that of the stag's
antlers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account