The temple was built with great regularity (Figs. 137, 138). It is an
accurate rectangle of mud brick, with a kisu of burnt brick, for, like
so many others, it has been heightened. It is divided into two clearly
distinguishable parts: the eastern, intended for the cult with the cella
to the south, in which the postament stood in the niche in the wall; and
the western, which resembled a private house of two courts. Here the
priest, the temple administrator, may have lived. Two gates
distinguished by the towered façade, led, each of them, through a
vestibule into the court in front of the cella. In addition a doorway
gave direct access to the chamber in the north-east corner, where the
public could transact business with the temple officials, without being
forced to enter the enclosed part of the temple. The northern gate was
indicated as the main entrance by the paved site for an altar (Fig.
139). The brick casket at its eastern jamb contained a pottery dove, and
a small piece of pottery with an inscription that has not been
satisfactorily explained hitherto, although it is fairly clearly
written.[4]
Footnote 4:
_Oriental Literaturzeitung_, 1911, No. 7:—
Ungnad translates the inscription: 1. (iṣu) ṣupur iṣṣuri(?) li
(?)-in-ti-ka (?) 2. paan ... -šù(?)-du abulli-šu 3. l[i]-ni’-irat-su
4. mit-gar-śu u(?) ki-bi-su(?) li-in-na(?)[...]. “May the claw of the
bird (?) tear to pieces (?) the countenance of him, who ... his gate,
and may it hold back his breast; him who is favourable to him and
(?) ... may he....”
Peiser translates: 1. ṣupur iṣṣuri lintikā 2. pān nakri šudu abullim
3. linī’ iratsu 4. nuḳarśu u kibīsu linnasiḫ. “May the bird’s claw
press down the countenance of the foe before the door, and check his
breast, may his devastating step be turned away.”
[Illustration:
FIG. 139.—Reconstruction of temple “Z.”
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 140.—Figure of Papsukal from temple “Z”—front view.
]
[Illustration:
FIG. 141.—Figure of Papsukal from temple “Z”—back view.
]
Even at the lowest pavement level of 20 centimetres below zero the
temple was in use. Here stood the oldest postament, and below it, as was
to be expected, was the brick casket (simâku) with the statuette of
Papsukal inscribed on its shoulder-blades (Figs. 140, 141). Above this
postament there lay four more pavements divided from each other by
layers of earth, which represent four successive heightenings of the
temple level, carrying it up to 5.84 metres above zero. The slight
raising of half a metre would make scarcely any change in the building,
but when the level was heightened as much as 4 metres at one time, a
heightening of the roof and other rebuilding was unavoidable. At the
same time the former ground-plan was generally retained with such great
care, that at this temple we observed nothing on the walls themselves
resulting from such rebuilding, although we laid them bare to a height
of 9 metres.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account