The Executioner's Knife; Or, Joan of ArcSue, Eugène
General
The Executioner's Knife; Or, Joan of Arc
Sue, Eugène
Biographical fiction; Christian fiction; Christian women saints -- Fiction; Joan, of Arc, Saint, 1412-1431 -- Fiction
BISHOP CAUCHON--"However devoted to me the judges of the tribunal may
be, they will require some proofs in order to condemn Joan and protect
the dignity of the Church. Now, then, the she-devil has a reputation for
craftiness. I have read her answers to the interrogatories at Poitiers.
She more than once astounded and embarrassed the judges by her quick wit
or by the loftiness of her answers. It must not go at Rouen as it did at
Poitiers. This is the summary course that I would stamp upon the
process, to the end that Joan may not escape. To obtain from herself
condemnatory admissions, and pronounce her guilty upon them. And then
after her sentence to find means of causing her to make a public
recantation and to admit her to penitence."
CANON LOYSELEUR (stupefied)--"But if she renounces her errors, then she
is not condemned, monseigneur! If she is admitted to penitence, then she
can not be burned!"
BISHOP CAUCHON--"Patience, listen. If Joan abjures her errors, she is
admitted to penitence. We shall have given a proof of our gentleness
and indulgence. At any rate the fools will think so."
CANON LOYSELEUR--"If Joan escapes the fagot your end is not reached."
BISHOP CAUCHON--"For one day. Immediately after she must be led by some
skilful method to relapse into her previous heretical conduct. We may
even get her to maintain that her abjuration was the result of a snare,
a surprise. We can thus lead her to persevere in her damnable errors.
The criminal relapse then gives us the right to condemn the penitent as
'relapsed.' We abandon her to the secular arm, and by it she is
delivered to the executioner. Thus, the appearances of ecclesiastical
charity being saved, the full burden will fall upon Joan herself."
CANON LOYSELEUR--"The proposal is excellent. But how to carry it out?"
BISHOP CAUCHON--"I shall come to that presently. Let us first consider
what flagrant proofs of heresy we must find in Joan's answers. One
example will explain my thoughts to you. The girl pretends to have seen
saints and angels and to have heard supernatural voices. Now, then, in
the eye of the Church and its holy canons Joan has not the _sufficient
and recognized, quality to converse and hold commerce with the blessed
beings of paradise_. In the eye of the canon law, the visions and
apparitions of the said Joan, so far from proceeding from God, and
emanating from celestial beings--"
CANON LOYSELEUR--"Proceed directly from Satan. A flagrant proof that
Joan is an invoker of devils, hence a witch, hence deserving of the
fagot."
BISHOP CAUCHON--"One moment--a stone lies there in our way. It will have
to be removed."
CANON LOYSELEUR--"What stone, monseigneur? I do not see the said stone."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account