The Exploits of Juve: Being the Second of the Series of the "Fantômas" Detective TalesSouvestre, Pierre
General
The Exploits of Juve: Being the Second of the Series of the "Fantômas" Detective Tales
Souvestre, Pierre
Detective and mystery stories; Fantômas (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
"Valgrand came back, but he had gone mad. He managed to get to his
dressing-room after taking the wrong door. 'I don't know a single word
of my part,' he confessed to me. I comforted him as best I could, but he
flung himself down on his couch and shook his head helplessly at me. 'I
have been very ill, Bonardin,' then suddenly he demanded: 'Where is
Charlot?'
"Charlot was his dresser. I remembered now that Charlot had not returned
to the theatre since his master's disappearance. His body was found
later in the Rue Messier. He had been murdered. I did not want to
mention this to him for fear it might upset him still more, so I advised
my old friend to wait for me till the end of the play and let me keep
him company. I intended to take him home and fetch a doctor. Valgrand
assented readily. I was then obliged to leave him hurriedly: they were
calling me--it was my cue. When I returned Valgrand had vanished: he had
left the theatre. We were not to see him again!"
"A sad affair," commented Fandor.
Bonardin continued his narrative:
"Shortly afterwards in a deserted house in the Rue Messier, near
Boulevard Arago, the police found the body of a murdered man. The corpse
was easily identified; it was that of Charlot, Valgrand's dresser."
"How did he come there? The house had no porter: the owner, an old
peasant, knew nothing."
"Well, what do you conclude from this?" asked Fandor.
"My theory is that Valgrand murdered his dresser, for some reason
unknown to us. Then, overcome by his crime, he went mad and committed
suicide. Of that there is no doubt."
"Oh!" muttered Fandor, a little taken aback by this unexpected
assertion.
The journalist, though he had closely followed the actor's account, was
far from drawing the same conclusions. For in fact, Gurn, Lord Beltham's
murderer, whom Fandor believed to be Fantômas, had certainly got
Valgrand executed in his stead. The Valgrand who came back to the
theatre, three days after the execution, was not the real one, but the
man who had taken his place--Gurn, the criminal, Gurn--Fantômas. Ah!
that was a stroke of the true Fantômas sort! It was certain that if
Valgrand's disappearance had been simultaneous with Gurn's execution,
there might have been suspicions. Gurn--Fantômas then found it necessary
to show Valgrand living to witnesses, so that these could swear that the
real Valgrand had not died instead of Gurn.
But Valgrand was an actor, Gurn--Fantômas was not! Not enough of one at
least to venture to take the place on the boards of such a consummate
player, such a famous tragedian.
"And that was the end?" asked Fandor.
"The end, no!" declared the actor. "Valgrand was married and had a son.
As is often the case with artists, the Valgrand marriage was not a
success, and madame, a singer of talent, was separated from her husband,
and travelled much abroad.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive