The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
The course that is actually pursued is to have a separate establishment
at Woolwich, with an officer, and several non-commissioned officers on
extra pay, so that the account stands thus:—[24]
£ s. d.
One officer, extra pay 182 10 0
One non-commissioned officer, ditto 27 7 6
Three non-commissioned officers, ditto 68 8 9
Contingent, not exceeding 200 0 0
------------
Apparent expense £478 6 3
But to this must be added—
The full pay of Lieut.-Colonel 300 0 5
His extra pay 273 15 0
Full pay of one officer, if a Captain 192 16 3
Ditto one non-commissioned ditto[25] 20 0 0
Ditto three ditto ditto 50 0 0
-------------
Real expense £1,314 17 11
In the estimate for civil service for 1850[26] the following items
occur:—
£ s. d.
Extra pay to Colonel Sabine, Royal Artillery, for
services in connexion with the Magnetic and
Meteorological Observations, for ten years, from
7th May, 1839, to 7th May, 1849, at 15s. a-day 2,739 15 0
Deduct 3s. 4d. per day granted him from 1st June,
1841, to 7th May, 1848, as compensation for loss
of command pay 434 8 0
--------------
£2,305 7 0
This certainly requires an explanation. Here is an officer not doing the
services of his profession, who it seems has been allowed a compensation
for what he _might_ have received if he _had_ rendered those services:
notwithstanding which, at the end of ten years, he claims and is allowed
the above sum of £2,305 7_s._ for services the payment of which it would
seem by this account was never contemplated during those ten years.
It is also to be remarked that Colonel Sabine does not reside at
Woolwich, where the only effective portion of the work is carried on.
§ But to return to our argument: it is singular that even the principles
on which science ought to be rewarded, are not entirely settled.
Should all equally great discoveries be rewarded in the same way,
without regard to the different positions in society which the
discoverers occupy? If this principle were admitted, the rewards must be
very large, or there would be none for the higher classes of society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account