The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of EnglandBabbage, Charles
History
The exposition of 1851 : $b or, Views of the industry, the science, and the government, of England
Babbage, Charles
Great Exhibition (1851 : London, England)
“The two following [applications made to the Government] will
sufficiently explain them [the undescribed applications of the first
half of the period of unanswered application]:—On the 23rd December,
1834, Mr. Babbage addressed a statement to the Duke of Wellington,
pointing out the only [the reader will remark this word _only_] plans
which in his opinion could be pursued for terminating the questions
relative to the _Difference Engine_, namely—_First_, the Government
might desire Mr. Babbage to continue the construction of the engine in
the hands of the person who has hitherto been employed in making it.
_Secondly_, the Government might wish to know whether any other person
could be substituted for the engineer at present employed to continue
the construction—a course which was possible. _Thirdly_, the Government
might (although he did not presume that they would) substitute some
person to superintend the completion of the engine instead of Mr.
Babbage himself. _Fourthly_, the Government might be disposed to give up
the undertaking entirely.” A letter to Sir Robert Peel from Mr. Babbage,
dated the 7th of April, 1835, and enclosing the above plans, concludes
thus: “The delays and difficulties of years will, I hope, excuse my
expressing a wish that I may at length be relieved from them by an early
decision of the Government on the question.”
From the above it appears that at the end of 1834, Mr. Babbage—though
then so full of the _new_ engine, that in September he had asked an
audience of Lord Melbourne, to communicate the exact state of the case,
and to request, of course, his consideration of the question whether the
new engine should or should not take the place of the old one—began his
applications to the Government with distinct reference to the _old_
engine, and to the question of its completion or abandonment. Certainly
the first of the two applications was not well timed, for it was made
when the Duke of Wellington held all the seals, and a Government courier
was hunting Sir Robert Peel all over Italy, to tell him to come home
quick and be Prime Minister. But it was repeated to Sir Robert Peel in
the April following, when the latter was also in official possession of
the previous letter.
Mr. Babbage having thus filled up the only _lacuna_ which the public
press has brought to his notice, we can but repeat that those who would
impute to him the blame of the failure of Government to complete his
Calculating Machine must begin by proving his statement to be false or
defective. In 1835 he complains _to_ the Government of “delays and
difficulties,” which he implies to be mainly caused _by_ the Government,
and he gets no answer whatever to repeated applications, until 1843.
Those who have propagated the rumours that his conduct was the cause of
the delay, and that he compromised his friends in the Royal Society, who
had aided in bringing him under the notice of the Government, are bound
to abstain in future, or to show cause.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account