The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 1Stokes, George Thomas
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 1
Stokes, George Thomas
Bible. Acts -- Commentaries; Bible. Acts -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
I. This reticence and obscurity of the Apostles may seem to us now
somewhat strange, as it certainly does seem most strange how the
Apostles could have remained safe at Jerusalem when all others had to
fly. The Apostles naturally now appear to us the most prominent
members of the Jerusalem, nay, farther, of the Christian Church
throughout the world. But then, as we have already observed, one of
the great difficulties in historical study is to get at the right
point of view, and to keep ourselves at that point under very varying
combinations of circumstances. We are apt to fling ourselves back, or,
if the expression be allowed, to project ourselves backwards into the
past, and to think that men must always have attributed the same
importance to particular persons or particular circumstances as we
do. We now see the whole course of events, and can estimate them, not
according to any mere temporary importance or publicity they may have
attained, but according to their real and abiding influence. Viewing
the matter in this light, we now can see that the Apostles were much
more important persons than the deacons. But the question is, not how
we regard the Apostles and the deacons, but how did the Sanhedrin and
the Jews of Jerusalem in Stephen's and Philip's time view these two
classes. They knew nothing of the Apostles as such.[141] They knew of
them simply as unlearned and ignorant men who had been once or twice
brought before the Council. They knew of Stephen, and perhaps, too, of
Philip, as cultured Grecian Jews, whose wisdom and eloquence and
persuasive power they were not able to resist; and it is no wonder
that in the eyes of the Sadducean majority, who then ruled the Jewish
senate, the deacons should be specially sought out and driven away.
[141] The very name Apostle connotes for us an extraordinary
office and dignity, placing the Twelve upon an exalted plane far
above all others. But the Jewish Council knew nothing of this. The
term Apostle was in common use amongst the Jews. To us it seems
almost presumptuous to apply the name to any but the Twelve,
though the New Testament applies it more widely. The title Apostle
was given among the Jews to the legate or Church officer who
attended on every synagogue and discharged its commands. It was
also specially bestowed upon the messengers of the Jewish high
priest or patriarch who collected the temple tax while the temple
existed, and afterwards the poll tax or tribute paid by every Jew
throughout the world towards the support of the patriarch and the
Sanhedrin. The name Apostle is found in this sense in the
Theodosian Code down to so late a period as the fifth century. Our
Lord and the early Church simply adopted this title Apostle from
the synagogue, as they adopted so many other rites and usages,
baptism, holy communion, the various orders of the ministry, and a
liturgical service.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account