The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 2Stokes, George Thomas
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Acts of the Apostles, Vol. 2
Stokes, George Thomas
Bible. Acts -- Commentaries; Bible. Acts -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
often conspire to make one return home from a hard day's work feeling
miserable within on account of repeated falls and shortcomings. Shall
we then act as they did? Shall we shut out the world completely and
cease to take any part in a struggle which seems to tell so
disastrously upon the equable calm of our spiritual life? Nay indeed,
for such a course would be unworthy a soldier of the Cross, and very
unlike the example shown by the blessed apostle St. Paul, who had to
battle not only against others, but had also to battle against himself
and his own passionate nature, and was crowned as a victor, not
because he ran away, but because he conquered through the grace of
Christ.
[130] "Origen started this theory that the dispute between Peter
and Paul was simulated; in other words, being of one mind in the
matter they got up this scene that St. Paul might the more
effectually condemn the Judaisers through the chief of the
apostles, who, acknowledging the justice of the rebuke, set them
an example of submission. Thus he, in fact, substituted the much
graver charge of dishonesty against both apostles in order to
exculpate the one from the comparatively venial offence of moral
cowardice and inconsistency. Nevertheless this view commended
itself to a large number of subsequent writers, and for some time
may be said to have reigned supreme." (Lightfoot's _Galatians_, p.
129.) St. Chrysostom and St. Jerome maintained the same view,
while St. Augustine opposed it. The epistles exchanged between
Jerome and Augustine on this topic are very interesting. They may
be most easily perused in Augustine's _Epistles_, vol. i., pp. 131
and 280, as translated in T. & T. Clark's series (Edinburgh,
1872).
[131] Mark is usually regarded as nephew to Barnabas. This opinion
is grounded upon Col. iv. 10, as translated in the Authorised
Version. They were, however, cousins merely. The Revised Version
translates Col. iv. 10 thus: "Mark, the cousin of Barnabas." Dr.
Lightfoot, in his _Colossians_, p. 236, has a long note showing
that the word used about St. Mark in that passage is ὁ ἀνεψιός,
which always means cousin german: see Thayer's edition of Grimm's
_Lexicon of New Testament_, _s.v._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account