The Expositor's Bible: The Book of DanielFarrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Daniel
Farrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Bible. Daniel -- Commentaries
IV. The bear, which places itself upon one side, is the Median
Empire, smaller than the Chaldean, as the bear is smaller and less
formidable than the lion. The crouching on one side is obscure. It
is explained by some as implying that it was lower in exaltation
than the Babylonian Empire; by others that "it gravitated, as
regards its power, only towards the countries west of the Tigris and
Euphrates."[501] The meaning of the "three ribs in its mouth" is also
uncertain. Some regard the number three as a vague round number;
others refer it to the three countries over which the Median dominion
extended--Babylonia, Assyria, and Syria; others, less probably, to
the three chief cities. The command, "Arise, devour much flesh,"
refers to the prophecies of Median conquest,[502] and perhaps to
uncertain historical reminiscences which confused "Darius the Mede"
with Darius the son of Hystaspes. Those who explain this monster as
an emblem, not of the Median but of the Medo-Persian Empire, neglect
the plain indications of the Book itself, for the author regards the
Median and Persian Empires as distinct.[503]
V. The leopard or panther represents the Persian kingdom.[504] It has
four wings on its back, to indicate how freely and swiftly it soared
to the four quarters of the world. Its four heads indicate four
kings. There were indeed twelve or thirteen kings of Persia between
B.C. 536 and B.C. 333; but the author of the Book of Daniel, who of
course had no books of history before him, only thinks of the four
who were most prominent in popular tradition--namely (as it would
seem), Cyrus, Darius, Artaxerxes, and Xerxes.[505] These are the only
four names which the writer knew, because they are the only ones
which occur in Scripture. It is true that the Darius of Neh. xii.
22 is not the Great Darius, son of Hystaspes, but Darius Codomannus
(B.C. 424-404). But this fact may most easily have been overlooked in
uncritical and unhistoric times. And "power was given to it," for it
was far stronger than the preceding kingdom of the Medes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account