The Expositor's Bible: The Book of DanielFarrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Daniel
Farrar, F. W. (Frederic William)
Bible. Daniel -- Commentaries
It is dated in the third year of Cyrus (B.C. 535).[639] We have already
been told that Daniel lived to see the first year of Cyrus (i. 21).
This verse, if accepted historically, would show that at any rate
Daniel did not return to Palestine with the exiles. Age, high rank,
and opportunities of usefulness in the Persian Court may have combined
to render his return undesirable for the interests of his people.
The date--the last given in the life of the real or ideal Daniel--is
perhaps here mentioned to account for the allusions which follow to the
kingdom of Persia. But with the great and moving fortunes of the Jews
after the accession of Cyrus, and even with the beginning of their new
national life in Jerusalem, the author is scarcely at all concerned. He
makes no mention of Zerubbabel the prince, nor of Joshua the priest,
nor of the decree of Cyrus, nor of the rebuilding of the Temple; his
whole concern is with the petty wars and diplomacy of the reign of
Antiochus Epiphanes, of which an account is given, so minute as either
to furnish us with historical materials unknown to any other historian,
or else is difficult to reconcile with the history of that king's reign
as it has been hitherto understood.
In this chapter, as in the two preceding, there are great
difficulties and uncertainties about the exact significance of some
of the verses, and textual emendations have been suggested. The
readers of the Expositor's Bible would not, however, be interested
in minute and dreary philological disquisitions, which have not
the smallest moral significance, and lead to no certain result.
The difficulties affect points of no doctrinal importance, and
the greatest scholars have been unable to arrive at any agreement
respecting them. Such difficulties will, therefore, merely be
mentioned, and I shall content myself with furnishing what appears to
be the best authenticated opinion.
The first and second verses are rendered partly by Ewald and
partly by other scholars, "_Truth is the revelation, and distress
is great;_[640] _therefore understand thou the revelation, since
there is understanding of it in the vision._" The admonition calls
attention to the importance of "the word," and the fact that reality
lies beneath its enigmatic and apocalyptic form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account