The Expositor's Bible: The Book of ExodusChadwick, G. A. (George Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Exodus
Chadwick, G. A. (George Alexander)
Bible. Exodus -- Commentaries
The history of Menephtah is that of a mean and cowardly prince. Dreams
forbade him to share the perils of his army; a prophecy induced him to
submit to exile, until his firstborn was of age to recover his dominions
for him; and all we know of him is admirably suited to the character
represented in this narrative. He will now submit once more, and this
time every one shall go; yet he cannot make a frank concession: the
flocks and herds (most valuable after the ravages of the murrain and the
hail) must remain as a hostage for their return. But Moses is
inflexible: not a hoof shall be left behind; and then the frenzy of a
baffled autocrat breaks out into wild menaces; “Get thee from me; take
heed to thyself; see my face no more; for in the day thou seest my face
thou shalt die.” The assent of Moses was grim: the rupture was complete.
And when they once more met, it was the king that had changed his
purpose, and on his face, not that of Moses, was the pallor of impending
death.
In the conduct of the prophet, all through these stormy scenes, we see
the difference between a meek spirit and a craven one. He was always
ready to intercede; he never “reviles the ruler,” nor transgresses the
limits of courtesy toward his superior in rank; and yet he never
falters, nor compromises, nor fails to represent worthily the awful
Power he represents.
In the series of sharp contrasts, all the true dignity is with the
servant of God, all the meanness and the shame with the proud king, who
begins by insulting him, goes on to impose on him, and ends by the most
ignominious of surrenders, crowned with the most abortive of treacheries
and the most abject of defeats.
FOOTNOTES:
[18] Oddly enough, the same historian already quoted, relating the story
of the same day at Leipsic, says of Napoleon’s dialogue with M. de
Merfeld, that he “used an expression which, if uttered at the
Congress of Prague, would have changed his lot and ours. Unfortunately,
it was now too late.”
[19] Such is probably not the meaning in Ps. lxxviii. 49 (see R.V.),
though from it the tradition may have sprung.
CHAPTER XI.
_THE LAST PLAGUE ANNOUNCED._
xi. 1–10.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account