The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 2 (of 2)Smith, George Adam
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 2 (of 2)
Smith, George Adam
Bible. Isaiah -- Commentaries
III. liii. 4-6. The earliest and most common moral judgement, which
men pass upon pain, is that which is implied in its name--that it is
penal. A man suffers because God is angry with him and has stricken
him. So Job's friends judged him, and so these speakers tell us they
had at first judged the Servant. _We had accounted him stricken,
smitten of God and afflicted_,--_stricken_, that is, with a plague
of sickness, as Job was, for the simile of the sick man is still
kept up; _smitten of God and degraded_ or _humbled_, for it seemed
to them that God's hand was in the Servant's sickness, to punish and
disgrace him for his own sins. But now they know they were wrong. The
hand of God was indeed upon the Servant, and the reason was sin; yet
the sin was not his, but theirs. _Surely our sicknesses he bore,
and our pains he took as his burden. He was pierced for iniquities
that were ours. He was crushed for crimes that were ours._ Strictly
interpreted, these verses mean no more than that the Servant was
involved in the consequences of his people's sins. The verbs _bore_
and _made his burden_ are indeed taken by some to mean necessarily,
removal or expiation; but in themselves, as is clear from their
application to Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the whole of the generation
of Exile, they mean no more than implication in the reproach and
the punishment of the people's sins.[223] Nevertheless, as we have
explained in a note below, it is really impossible to separate the
suffering of a Servant, who has been announced as practical and
prosperous in his suffering, from the end for which it is endured. We
cannot separate the Servant's bearing of the people's guilt from his
removal of it. And, indeed, this practical end of his passion springs
forth, past all doubt, from the rest of the strophe, which declares
that the Servant's sufferings are not only vicarious but redemptive.
_The discipline of our peace was upon him, and with his stripes we
are healed._ Translators agree that _discipline of our peace_ must
mean discipline which procures our peace. The peace, the healing,
is ours, in consequence of the chastisement and the scourging that
was his. The next verse gives us the obverse and complement of the
same thought. The pain was his in consequence of the sin that was
ours. _All we like sheep had gone astray, and the Lord laid on him
the iniquity of us all_,--literally _iniquity_, but inclusive of its
guilt and consequences. Nothing could be plainer than these words.
The speakers confess, that they know that the Servant's suffering was
both vicarious and redemptive.[224]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account