The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 2 (of 2)Smith, George Adam
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 2 (of 2)
Smith, George Adam
Bible. Isaiah -- Commentaries
In ver. 25 a phrase is used of Cyrus which is very obscure, and
to which, considering its vagueness even upon the most definite
construction, far too much importance has been attached. The
meaning of the words, the tenses, the syntax--perhaps even the
original text itself--of this verse are uncertain. The English
revisers give, _I have raised up one from the north, and he
is come; from the rising of the sun one that calleth upon My
Name_. This is probably the true syntax.[73] But in what tense
is the verb _to call_, and what does _calling upon My name_
mean? In the Old Testament the phrase is used in two senses,--to
_invoke or adore_, and to _proclaim_ or _celebrate the name_
of a person.[74] As long as scholars understood that Cyrus was
a monotheist, there was a temptation to choose the former of
these meanings, and to find in the verse Jehovah's claim upon
the Persian, as a worshipper of Himself, the One True God. But
this interpretation received a shock from the discovery of a
proclamation of Cyrus after his entry into Babylon, in which
he invokes the names of Babylonian deities, and calls himself
their "servant."[75] Of course his doing so in the year 538 does
not necessarily discredit a description of him as a monotheist
eight years before. Between 548 and 546--the probable date of
ch. xli.--a prophet might in all good faith have hailed as a
worshipper of Jehovah a Persian who still stood in the _rising
of the sun_,--who had not yet issued from the east and its
radiant repute of a religion purer than the Babylonian; although
eight years afterwards, from motives of policy, the same king
acknowledged the gods of his new subjects. This may be; but
there is a more natural way out of the difficulty. Is it fair
to lay upon the expression, _calleth on My name_, so precise a
meaning as that of a strict monotheism? Some have turned to the
other use of the verb, and, taking it in the future tense, have
translated, _who shall proclaim_ or _celebrate My name_,--which
Cyrus surely did, when, in the name of Jehovah, he drew up
the edict for the return of the Jews to Palestine.[76] But do
we need to put even this amount of meaning upon the phrase?
In itself it is vague, but it also stands parallel to another
vague phrase: _I have raised up one from the north, and he is
come; from the sunrising one who calleth on My name._ Taken
in apposition to the phrase _he is come, calleth on My name_
may mean no more than that, answering to the instigation of
Jehovah, and owning His impulse, Cyrus by his career proclaimed
or celebrated Jehovah's name. In any case, we have said enough
to show that, in our comparative ignorance of what Cyrus' faith
was, and in face of the elastic use of the phrase _to call on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account