The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 2 (of 2)Smith, George Adam
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Isaiah, Volume 2 (of 2)
Smith, George Adam
Bible. Isaiah -- Commentaries
[63] Lit. _from the head_, "da capo." I am not sure, however, that it
does not rather mean _beforehand_, like our on ahead.
[64] See p. 121.
[65] This seems to me to be more likely to be the meaning of the
prophet, than the absolute _from the beginning_. It suits its
parallel _beforehand_, and it is more in line with the general demand
of the chapter for anticipation of events. It is literally from the
head, "da capo," _cf._ p. 117.
[66] ראשנות r'ishonôth is a relative term, meaning _head things_,
_things ahead_, _first things_, _prior things_, whether in rank
or time. Here of course the time meaning is undoubted. But _ahead
of_ what? _prior_ to what?--this is the difficulty. Ewald, Hitzig,
A. B. Davidson, Driver, etc., take it as prior to the standpoint
of the speaker; things that happened or were uttered previous to
him,--a sense in which the word is used in subsequent chapters. But
Delitzsch, Hahn, Cheyne, etc., take it to be things prior to other
things that will happen in the later future, early events, as opposed
to הבאות of the next clause, which they take to mean subsequent
things, _things that are to come_ afterwards. I think Dr. Davidson's
reasons (see _Expositor_, second series, vol. vii., p. 256) are quite
conclusive against this view of Delitzsch, that in this clause the
idols are being asked to predict events in the near future. It is
difficult, as he says, to see why the idols should be given a choice
between the earlier and the later future: nor does the הבאות of the
contrasted clause at all suggest a later future; it simply means
_things coming_, a term which is as applicable to the near as to the
far future. Nevertheless, I am not persuaded that Dr. Davidson's own
view of _r'ishonôth_ is the correct one. The rest of the context
(see above) is occupied with predictions of the future only. And
_r'ishonôth_ does not necessarily mean previous predictions, although
used in this sense in the subsequent chapters. It simply means, as
we have seen, _head things_, _things ahead_, _things beforehand_, or
_fountain-things_, _origins_, _causes_. That we are to understand it
here in some such general and absolute sense is suggested, I think,
by the word אחריתן which follows it, _their result_ or _issue_, and
is confirmed by ראשון, r'ishôn (masc. singular) of ver. 27, which is
undoubtedly used in a general sense, meaning _something_ or _somebody
on ahead_, an anticipator, predicter, _forerunner_ (as Cheyne
gives it), or as I have rendered it above, neuter, a _prediction_.
If _r'ishôn_ in ver. 27 means a thing or a man given beforehand,
then r'ishonôth in ver. 22 may also mean things given beforehand,
predictions made now, or at least things selected and announced as
causes now, whose issue, אחריתן, may be recognised in the future. In
a word, r'ishonôth would mean things not necessarily _previous_ to
the speech in which they were allowed, but simply things _previous_
to certain results, or anticipating certain events, either as their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account