The Expositor's Bible: The Book of NumbersWatson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of Numbers
Watson, Robert A. (Robert Alexander)
Bible. Numbers -- Commentaries
One must be sorry for men whose impotent anger has to fall on
expedients so miserably inadequate. Moab defeated by the Amorites
sees them in turn vanquished and scattered by this host which has
suddenly appeared, and to all ordinary reckoning has no place nor
right in the region. Sad as was the defeat which deprived Balak
of half his land and left his people in poverty, this incursion
and its success foreboded greater trouble. The king was bound to
do something, and, feeling himself unable to fight, this was his
scheme. The utter uselessness of it from every point of view gives
the story a singular pathos. But the world under Divine providence
cannot be left in a region where superstition reigns and progress is
impossible--simply that a people like the Moabites may settle again
on their lees, and that others may continue to enjoy what seem to
them to be their rights. There must be a stirring of human existence,
a new force and new ideas introduced among the peoples, even at the
expense of war and bloodshed. And our sympathy with Balak fails when
we recollect that Israel had refrained from attacking Moab in its day
of weakness, had even refrained from asking leave to pass through
its impoverished territory. The feelings of the vanquished had been
respected. Perhaps Balak, with the perversity of a weak man and an
incompetent prince, resented this as much as anything.
Balaam was now brought into the field of Zophim, or the Watchers, to
the "top of Pisgah," whence he could see only a part of the camp of
Israel. The Hebrew here as well as in xxii. 41 is ambiguous. It has
even been interpreted as meaning that on the first occasion part of the
encampment only was in view, and on the second occasion the whole of it
(so Keil _in loco_). But the tenor of the narrative corresponds better
with the translation given in the English Version. The precise spot
here called the top of Pisgah has not been identified. In the opinion
of some the name Pisgah survives in the modern Siaghah; but even if
it does we are not helped in the least. Others take Pisgah as meaning
simply "hill," and read "the field of Zophim on the top of the hill."
The latter translation would obviate the difficulty that in Deut.
xxxiv. 1 it is said that Moses, when the time of his death approached,
"went up from the plains of Moab unto Mount Nebo, to the top of Pisgah
that is over against Jericho." Pisgah may have been the name of the
range; yet again in Numb. xxvii. 12, and Deut. xxxii. 49, Abarim is
given as the name of the range of which Nebo is a peak. We are led to
the conclusion that Pisgah was the name in general use for a hill-top
of some peculiar form. The root meaning of the word is difficult to
make out. It may at all events be taken as certain that this top of
Pisgah is not the same as that to which Moses ascended to die. Balak
and his princes had not as yet ventured so far beyond the Arnon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account