The Expositor's Bible: The Book of the Twelve Prophets, Vol. 1: Commonly Called the MinorSmith, George Adam
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of the Twelve Prophets, Vol. 1: Commonly Called the Minor
Smith, George Adam
Bible. Minor Prophets -- Commentaries
[254] The king's.
[255] See above, p. 126.
[256] δυσσεβίας μὲν ὕβρις τέκος (Æschylus, _Eumen._, 534): cf.
_Odyssey_, xiv. 262; xvii. 431.
[257] _I.e._ a tribe; Doughty, _Arabia Deserta_, I. 335.
[258] Judges xix., xx.
[259] Duhm was the first to publish reasons for rejecting the passage
(_Theol. der Propheten_, 1875, p. 119), but Wellhausen had already
reached the same conclusion (_Kleine Propheten_, p. 71). Oort and Stade
adhere. On the other side see Robertson Smith, _Prophets of Israel_,
398, and Kuenen, who adheres to Smith's arguments (_Onderzoek_).
[260] "It is plain that Amos could not have excepted Judah from the
universal ruin which he saw to threaten the whole land; or at all
events such exception would have required to be expressly made on
special grounds."--Robertson Smith, _Prophets_, 398.
[261] _Ibid._
[262] צדיק, _righteous_: hardly, as most commentators take it, the
_legally_ (as distinguished from the _morally_) _righteous_; the
rich cruelly used their legal rights to sell respectable and honest
members of society into slavery.
[263] By adapting the LXX. So far as we know Wellhausen is right in
saying that the Massoretic text, which our English version follows,
gives no sense. LXX. reads, also without much sense as a whole, τὰ
πατοῦντα ἐπὶ τὸν χοῦν τῆς γῆς, καὶ ἐκονδύλιζον εἰς κεφαλὰς πτῶχων.
[264] So rightly the LXX. Or the definite article may be here used in
conformity with the common Hebrew way of employing it to designate, not
a definite individual, but a member of a definite, well-known genus.
[265] On the use of Amorite for all the inhabitants of Canaan see
Driver's _Deut._, pp. 11 f.
[266] The verb עוק of the Massoretic text is not found elsewhere, and
whether we retain it, or take it as a variant of, or mistake for,
צוק, or adopt some other reading, the whole phrase is more or less
uncertain, and the exact shade of meaning has to be guessed, though the
general sense remains pretty much the same. The following is a complete
note on the subject, with reasons for adopting the above conclusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account