The Expositor's Bible: The Book of the Twelve Prophets, Vol. 1: Commonly Called the MinorSmith, George Adam
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Book of the Twelve Prophets, Vol. 1: Commonly Called the Minor
Smith, George Adam
Bible. Minor Prophets -- Commentaries
[305] Literally _the Group_ and _the Giant_. כימה, Kimah, signifies
group, or little heap. Here it is rendered by Aq. and at Job ix. 9
by LXX. Ἀρκτοῦρος; and here by Theod. and in Job xxxviii. 31, _the
chain_, or _cluster, of the group_ Πλειάδες. The Targ. and Pesh. always
give it as Kima, _i.e._ Pleiades. And this is the rendering of most
moderns. But Stern takes it for Sirius with its constellation of the
Great Dog, for the reason that this is the brightest of all stars, and
therefore a more suitable fellow for Orion than the dimmer Pleiades can
be. כסיל, the Fool or Giant, is the Hebrew name of Ὠρίων, by which the
LXX. render it. Targum ניפלא. To the ancient world the constellation
looked like the figure of a giant fettered in heaven, "a fool so far as
he trusted in his bodily strength" (Dillmann). In later times he was
called Nimrod. His early setting came at the time of the early rains.
Cf. with the passage Job ix. 9 and xxxviii. 31.
[306] The abstract noun meaning _deep shadow_, LXX. σκιά, and
rendered _shadow of death_ by many modern versions.
[307] So LXX., reading שׁבר for שׁד; it improves the rhythm, and
escapes the awkward repetition of שׁד.
[308] So LXX.
[309] Possible alternative: _make stagnant_.
[310] _Vision of Piers Plowman_, Passus IV., l. 52. Cf. the whole
passage.
[311] Uncertain; Hitzig takes it as the apodosis of the previous
clause: _Ye shall have to take from him a present of corn_, _i.e._ as
alms.
[312] See above, p. 33.
[313] Cf. "Pecca fortiter."
[314] As, for instance, the prophet looks forward to in iii. 12.
[315] _God of Hosts_, perhaps an intrusion (?) between אדני and יהוה.
[316] I have ventured to rearrange the order of the clauses, which in
the original is evidently dislocated.
[317] Lit. _the house_.
[318] Eph. v. 2; etc.
[319] No one doubts that this verse is interrogative. But the
Authorised Eng. Ver. puts it in a form--_Have ye brought unto Me?_
etc.--which implies blame that they did not do so. Ewald was the
first to see that, as rendered above, an appeal to the forty years
was the real intention of the verse. So after him nearly all critics,
also the Revised Eng. Ver.: _Did ye bring unto Me?_ On the whole
question of the possibility of such an appeal see above, pp. 100
ff., and cf. Jer. vii. 22, which distinctly declares that in the
wilderness God prescribed no ritual to Israel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account