The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle of St Paul to the RomansMoule, H. C. G. (Handley Carr Glyn)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle of St Paul to the Romans
Moule, H. C. G. (Handley Carr Glyn)
Bible. Romans -- Commentaries
Him (not it, but Him) with the acceptance of not His word only but His
deed. He is the God of Peace. How do we know it? We thought He was the
God of the tribunal, and the doom. Yes; but He has "brought the great
Shepherd from the dead, in the blood of the everlasting Covenant"
(Heb. xiii. 20). Then, O eternal Father of our Lord, we will believe
Thee; we will believe in Thee; we will, we do, in the very letter of
the words Thou didst bid Thy messenger write down here, "_believe upon
Thee_," ἐπὶ τὸν Ἐγείραντα, as in a deep repose. Truly, in _this_
glorious respect, though Thou art consuming Fire, "there is nothing in
Thee to dread."
"_Who was delivered up because of our transgressions._" So dealt the
Father with the Son, who gave Himself. "It pleased the Lord to bruise
Him"; "He spared not His own Son." "_Because of our transgressions_";
to meet the fact that we had gone astray. What, was that fact thus to
be met? Was our self-will, our pride, our falsehood, our impurity, our
indifference to God, our resistance to God, to be thus met? Was it to
be met at all, and not rather left utterly alone to its own horrible
issues? Was it eternally necessary that, if met, it must be met thus,
by nothing less than the delivering up of Jesus our Lord? It was even
so. Assuredly if a milder expedient would have met our guilt, the
FATHER would not have "delivered up" the SON. The Cross was nothing if
not an absolute _sine quâ non_. There is that in sin, and in
God, which made it eternally necessary that--if man was to be
justified--the Son of God must not only live but die, and not only die
but die thus, delivered up, given over to be done to death, as those
who do great sin are done.
Deep in the heart of the divine doctrine of Atonement lies this
element of it, the "_because of our transgressions_"; the exigency of
Golgotha, due to our sins. The remission, the acquittal, the
acceptance, was not a matter for the verbal _fiat_ of divine
autocracy. It was a matter not between God and creation, which to Him
is "a little thing," but between God and His Law, that is to say,
Himself, as He is eternal Judge. And this, to the Eternal, is _not_ a
little thing. So the solution called for no little thing, but for the
Atoning Death, for the laying by the Father on the Son of the
iniquities of us all, that we might open our arms and receive from the
Father the merits of the Son.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account