The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle to the GalatiansFindlay, George G. (George Gillanders)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle to the Galatians
Findlay, George G. (George Gillanders)
Bible. Galatians -- Commentaries
of Sarah was reasonable; and Abraham was compelled to recognise in
her demand the voice of God (vv. 10-12). The two boys, like Esau and
Jacob in the next generation, represented opposite principles and
ways of life, whose counterworking was to run through the course of
future history. Their incompatibility was already manifest.
[126] Kalisch, _Commentary_, on Genesis xxi. 9.
The Apostle's comparison must have been mortifying in the extreme
to the Judaists. They are told in plain terms that they are in the
position of outcast Ishmael; while uncircumcised Gentiles, without
a drop of Abraham's blood in their veins, have received the
promise forfeited by their unbelief. Paul could not have put his
conclusion in a form more unwelcome to Jewish pride. But without this
radical exposure of the legalist position it was impossible for him
adequately to vindicate his gospel and defend his Gentile children in
the faith.
II. From this contrast of birth "according to flesh" and "through
promise" is deduced the opposition between _the slave-born and
free-born sons_. "For these (the slave-mother and the free-woman) are
two covenants, one indeed bearing children unto bondage--which is
Hagar" (ver. 24). The other side of the antithesis is not formally
expressed; it is obvious. Sarah the princess, Abraham's true wife,
has her counterpart in the original covenant of promise renewed in
Christ, and in "the Jerusalem above, which is our mother" (ver. 26).
Sarah is the typical mother,[127] as Abraham is the father of the
children of faith. In the _systoichia_, or tabular comparison, which
the Apostle draws up after the manner of the schools, _Hagar_ and
_the Mosaic covenant_, _Sinai_ and _the Jerusalem that now is_ stand
in one file and "answer to" each other; _Sarah_ and _the Abrahamic
covenant_, _Zion_ and _the heavenly Jerusalem_ succeed in the same
order, opposite to them. "Zion" is wanting in the second file; but
"Sinai and Zion" form a standing antithesis (Heb. xii. 18-22); the
second is implied in the first. It was to _Zion_ that the words of
Isaiah cited in ver. 27, were addressed.
[127] Comp. Heb. xi. 11, 12; 1 Pet. iii. 6.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account