The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the CorinthiansDods, Marcus
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The First Epistle to the Corinthians
Dods, Marcus
Bible. Corinthians, 1st -- Commentaries
This, says Paul, was his case. "Though I preach the Gospel, I have
nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto
me, if I preach not the Gospel!" His call to the ministry had been so
exceptional, and had so distinctly and emphatically declared the grace
and purpose of Christ, that he felt bound by all that can constrain a
man to the devotedness of a lifetime. Paul felt what we now so clearly
see: that on him lay the gravest responsibilities. Had he declined to
preach, had he complained of bad usage, and stipulated for higher
terms, and withdrawn from the active propagation of Christianity, who
would or could have taken up the task he laid down? But while Paul
could not but be conscious of his importance to the cause of Christ,
he would arrogate to himself no credit on account of his arduous toil,
for from this, he says, he could not escape; necessity was laid upon
him. Whether he does his work willingly or unwillingly, still he must
do it. He dare not flinch. If he does it willingly, he has a reward;
if he does it unwillingly, still he is entrusted with a stewardship he
dare not neglect. What then is the reward he has, giving himself, as
he certainly does, _willingly_ to the work? His reward is that "when
he preaches the Gospel he makes the Gospel of Christ without charge."
The deep satisfaction he felt in dissociating the Gospel of
self-sacrifice from every thought of money or remuneration and in
offering it freely to the poorest as his Master's fit representative
was sufficient reward for him and incalculably greater than any other
he ever got or could conceive.
In other words, Paul saw that however it might be with other men, with
him there was no alternative but to preach the Gospel; the only
alternative was--was he to do it as a slave entrusted with a
stewardship, and who was compelled, however reluctant he might be, to
be faithful, or was he to do it as a free man, with his whole will and
heart? The reluctant slave could expect no reward; he was but
fulfilling an obligatory, inevitable duty. The free man might,
however, expect a reward; and the reward Paul chose was that he should
have none--none in the ordinary sense, but really the deepest and most
abiding of all: the satisfaction of knowing that, having freely
received, he had freely given, and had lifted the Gospel into a region
quite undimmed by the suspicion of self-seeking or any mists of
worldliness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account