The Expositor's Bible: The Gospel According to St. MarkChadwick, G. A. (George Alexander)
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Gospel According to St. Mark
Chadwick, G. A. (George Alexander)
Bible. Mark -- Commentaries
We too require the same caution. When we long for miracles, neglecting
those standing miracles of our faith, the gospel and the Church: when our
reason is satisfied of a doctrine or a duty, and yet we remain irresolute,
sighing for the impulse of some rare spiritual enlightenment or
excitement, for a revival, or a mission, or an oration to lift us above
ourselves, we are virtually asking to be shown what we already confess, to
behold a sign, while we possess the evidence.
And the only wisdom of the languid, irresolute will, which postpones
action in hope that feeling may be deepened, is to pray. It is by the
effort of communion with the unfelt, but confessed Reality above us, that
healthy feeling is to be recovered.
Men As Trees.
“And they come unto Bethsaida. And they bring to Him a blind man,
and beseech Him to touch him. And He took hold of the blind man by
the hand, and brought him out of the village; and when He had spit
on his eyes, and laid His hands upon him, He asked him, Seest thou
aught? And he looked up, and said, I see men; for I behold _them_
as trees, walking. Then again He laid His hands upon his eyes; and
he looked stedfastly, and was restored, and saw all things
clearly. And He sent him away to his home, saying, Do not even
enter into the village.”—MARK viii. 22-26 (R.V.).
When the disciples arrived at Bethsaida, they were met by the friends of a
blind man, who besought Him to touch him. And this gave occasion to the
most remarkable by far of all the progressive and tentative miracles, in
which means were employed, and the result was gradually reached. The
reasons for advancing to this cure by progressive stages have been much
discussed. St. Chrysostom and many others have conjectured that the blind
man had but little faith, since he neither found his own way to Jesus, nor
pleaded his own cause, like Bartimæus. Others brought him, and interceded
for him. This may be so, but since he was clearly a consenting party, we
can infer little from details which constitutional timidity would explain,
or helplessness (for the resources of the blind are very various), or the
zeal of friends or of paid servants, or the mere eagerness of a crowd,
pushing him forward in desire to see a marvel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account