The Expositor's Bible: The Second Book of SamuelBlaikie, William Garden
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Second Book of Samuel
Blaikie, William Garden
Bible. Samuel, 2nd -- Commentaries
It is an instructive fact that the history of these wars is given
so shortly. A single verse is all that is given to most of the
campaigns. This brevity shows very clearly that another spirit than
that which moulded ordinary histories guided the composition of
this book. It would be beyond human nature to resist the temptation
to describe great battles, the story of which is usually read with
such breathless interest, and which gratify the pride of the people
and reflect glory on the nation. It is not the object of Divine
revelation to furnish either brief annals or full details of wars
and other national events, except in so far as they have a spiritual
bearing--a bearing on the relation between God and the people. From
first to last the purpose of the Bible is simply to unfold the
dispensation of grace,--God's progress in revelation of His method of
making an end of sin, and bringing in everlasting righteousness.
We shall briefly notice what is said regarding the different
undertakings.
1. The first campaign was against the Philistines. Not even their
disastrous discomfiture near the plain of Rephaim had taught
submission to that restless people. On this occasion David carried
the war into their own country, and took some of their towns,
establishing garrisons there, as the Philistines had done formerly
in the land of Israel. There is some obscurity in the words which
describe one of his conquests. According to the Authorised Version,
"He took Metheg-ammah out of the hand of the Philistines." The
Revised Version renders, "He took the bridle of the mother city out
of the hand of the Philistines." The parallel passage in 1 Chron.
xviii. 1 has it, "He took Gath and her towns out of the hand of the
Philistines." This last rendering is quite plain; the other passage
must be explained in its light. Gath, the city of King Achish, to
which David had fled twice for refuge, now fell into his hands. The
loss of Gath must have been a great humiliation to the Philistines;
not even Samson had ever inflicted on them such a blow. And the
policy that led David (it could hardly have been without painful
feelings) to possess himself of Gath turned out successful; the
aggressive spirit of the Philistines was now fairly subdued, and
Israel finally delivered from the attacks of a neighbour that had
kept them for many generations in constant discomfort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account