The false assumptions of "democracy"Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Philosophy
The false assumptions of "democracy"
Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Democracy; Great Britain -- Social conditions; Social problems
As the result either of the ridiculous pomposity of those who have
acquired riches by commerce or industry, or else of the questionable
title to superiority that wealth alone confers, a curious phenomenon
began to be noticeable in England during the course of the latter half
of the 17th century,--and that was a certain artificial and asinine
haughtiness among the well-to-do, which made them unable to unbend in
the presence of those whose purses were less portentously swollen. It
is suggested that this became noticeable in the latter half of the
17th [p209] century; but, truth to tell, all the causes of it were in
existence in the middle of the previous century as the result of Henry
VIII.’s vulgar and disastrous reign. Most authorities would, however,
admit that the phenomenon, as a marked innovation, became noticeable
only in the 17th century.
Theretofore, wealth and good breeding, wealth and good family, wealth
and sound instinct, wealth and good manners, had, with but few and
notorious exceptions, been the only kinds of wealth known.
Suddenly, however, with the capitalistic exploitation of the land, the
nation’s mineral resources, and her people, a new kind of wealth came
into existence, wealth utterly unconnected with anything except the
most solemn and most self-complacent vulgarity in those who possessed
it.
These people, unable to rely upon those natural distinctions that
everybody recognises at once, which compel the inferior or the fool
instinctively to refrain from importunacies, and restrain the too
familiar hand, were forced to adopt a new method of holding their
brethren, so like themselves in all but brass, satisfactorily aloof.
How did they accomplish this? Since they had no natural dignity no
innate distinction, which might have allowed them to befriend the poor
with impunity, without any fear that is to say, of “losing caste”;
since they could not be classified apart from their poorer fellows
except by means of the ticket “wealth”; they invented barriers and
gulfs which were designed to be as wide and insuperable as their fear
of being taken for their poorer fellows was great. Being unable to rely
[p210] upon classification, they proceeded by means of cleavage.
This foolish and foolhardy expedient on the part of the vulgar rich,
which has survived to this day, has led to the absurd anomaly of a
society,--a community if you please,--in which a whole complicated
series of stratified groups, never meet, never in any circumstances
communicate with one another, except with the most ludicrous grimaces,
compressed lips, whispers, frowns, embarrassment, fear, contempt, and
hatred.
The wonder is, not that society constituted on these lines is now
falling to pieces; the miracle is that it should have lasted so long.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account