The false assumptions of "democracy"Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Philosophy
The false assumptions of "democracy"
Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Democracy; Great Britain -- Social conditions; Social problems
To deny it may sound pleasant, kind, humane, charitable, and
chivalrous; but it is not candid; and although to the ignorant, to the
sentimental and the thoughtless, that which is pleasant frequently
makes the appeal of truth itself, in the end that man or party who is
not straightforward about these matters is bound to be discovered and
reviled.
Those therefore who wish to reform all future societies, and who wish
to make it unnecessary for sufferers or suffering to exist in the
world, except at the will of the legislature, can do so only in one
of two ways.[22] Either they must close the backdoor through which
the violence of nature and life enters the community--that backdoor
being the free operation of the right to parenthood--or else they
must do what no society hitherto has ventured to do, _i.e._, they must
determine by law beforehand who is and who is not to be sacrificed.
The suffering which in society is the necessary outcome of the act of
violence which is procreation, that suffering which is the only means
of balancing this violence, does not necessarily fall on the heads of
all. It selects its victims as it were with a certain caprice. And
hitherto, while endeavouring to mitigate the severity of it as far as
possible, society has been content to leave its incidence more or less
to chance, to the blind forces which ultimately determine, as they do
in nature, the fate of all individual beings.
It is only in war time, when the kind of person to be sacrificed for
the whole is definitely indicated, that society proceeds by legislation
to select those who should suffer from those who should be spared. And
even then, a certain element of chance remains over by means of which
it is possible for large numbers of young men to escape the ultimate
price.
If, however, it is proposed to reform society so that it shall either
contain no violence, or that the effects of that violence shall be
annulled for the majority by legislative means, then whatever the
Socialist or Communist may have to say to the contrary, this can be
done only in one of two ways:
(_a_) Either man’s right to parenthood must be violated.
(_b_) Or the section of society which is to be sacrificed to balance
the original act of violence must be deliberately decided upon by
legislative means. [p115]
And since these are the only two alternatives, the Socialist, the
Communist, and the Bolshevist, are just as hopelessly committed to
them as any other advocate of a new social scheme, from which the
inequalities and injustices inseparable from all human communities
heretofore are to be absent.
_The fact that they are impossible alternatives invalidates the whole
of the Socialist and Communist’s position._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account