The false assumptions of "democracy"Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Philosophy
The false assumptions of "democracy"
Ludovici, Anthony M. (Anthony Mario)
Democracy; Great Britain -- Social conditions; Social problems
A certain unaffected hopelessness characterises the mood of modern
men, for which it is difficult to find an adequate cause. There is a
pessimism rife to-day, which, far from being a pose or a pretence,
lies so deeply imbedded in the hearts of most people, that it is their
constant effort to conceal, rather than to proclaim it, when they are
in the presence of their fellows. A cheerful smile, a laugh that sounds
like merriment, a vivacious and buoyant manner--these outward signs of
unruffled gaiety may now be simulated by men when they are in company;
they may even be enjoined upon all as social etiquette; but when once
he is left to himself, modern man smoothens out his laugh-wrinkled
cheeks, compresses his relaxed lips, and abandons himself to that
attitude of mind now perhaps as universal as it is secret, which for
lack of a better term we may describe as settled despondency.
Among the cultivated this attitude remains more or less a private
concern of the individual. The thinking man, unlike the savage, does
not beat his wife and children, or blame his immediate surroundings, if
he feels hopeless. He knows the cause is probably more remote than the
behaviour of his kith and kin, or circle of friends; and though he may
be as incapable as the savage of finding the true cause, he withholds
his anger, or postpones the expression of his gloomy thoughts until
such time as their true cause becomes apparent to him.
Among the uncultivated, however, this mood of gloom or of convinced
despair, harbouring as it does in minds that are less inclined to be
philosophical, renders them litigious and vindictive. Some one or
some circumstance not too remote must be responsible, it is thought,
for their peevishness; they therefore become irascible and angry,
and seek to vent their spleen on that person or thing which, on the
strength of its proximity alone, appears to be the immediate cause
of their ill-humour. Conditions that satisfied them theretofore now
become insufferable and must be changed; prospects that smiled upon
them formerly now appear too black to be faced with calm. Pleasure--or
rather distraction--is sought feverishly, gluttonously, until, since
it leaves them still with the old langour at their hearts, it also is
rejected as part of the general conspiracy to depress their spirits.
Nothing pleases, nothing beckons. The same aching certainty of
discontent always returns, whatever else may go.
When a nation feels like this, when a [p155] whole continent feels
like this, there arises what politicians are pleased to call a state
of “social unrest.” By giving it a name it is hoped presumably that it
will be explained away. Unfortunately, however accurate the terms of
a description may be, they do nothing towards helping to remove the
trouble they describe. But in this particular case it may be questioned
whether the words “social unrest” form even an accurate description.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account