The Family among the Australian Aborigines, a Sociological StudyMalinowski, Bronislaw
History
The Family among the Australian Aborigines, a Sociological Study
Malinowski, Bronislaw
Aboriginal Australians -- Social life and customs; Ethnology -- Australia; Families -- History
group acts as a body chiefly on ceremonial occasions. To sum up:
the local group is the joint land-owner; proprietorship means
exclusive rights to hunt and roam over the country; but in the
native's mind it has much deeper roots, and the connection between
the local group and its hunting-grounds is based upon all their
traditions and creeds. Their mode of living is scattered; they hang
usually round favourite spots (see below).
[416] _Nat. Tr._, pp. 9, 16 and _passim_ throughout both
works, especially in connection with the description of
totemism and totemic cult.
[417] _Nor. Tr._, p. 27.
[418] _Ibid._
[419] _Nat. Tr._, p. 16.
[420] _Nor. Tr._, p. 31.
[421] The ties between a totemic local group and its
hunting-grounds are based on the whole cycle of totemic
ideas on reincarnation, supernatural conception; on the
Oknanikilla and Ertnatulunga. The reader must be referred
to the works of Messrs. Spencer and Gillen and Strehlow and
to what is said about these points below in connection with
the native ideas on conception (Chap. VI.).
Speaking of the totemic myths of the Northern tribes Mr. Mathews
says: "In those olden days, as at present, the totemic ancestors
consisted of families or groups of families, who had their
recognized grounds in some part of the tribal territory."[422]
[422] _J. and Pr. R.S.N.S.W._, xl. p. 108.
Among the natives of Queensland[423] the territory is parcelled
out completely amongst the different local groups; the boundaries
are well known and mutually respected. This district is again
subdivided amongst the members of the local group; the proprietor
"has the exclusive right to direct when it should be hunted over,
and the grass burned and the wild animals destroyed." If other men
aggregate and use the products of his land he is regarded as the
master of ceremonies. This statement gives us at least a clear and
consistent definition of private proprietorship, which seems to be
of a formal, ceremonial character. But it is not complete. We do
not know if normally each family enjoys its district alone, with
the head of the family always master of ceremonies, or whether the
whole local group, or parts of it, hunt and roam usually in bodies.
This statement is, therefore, not very useful.
[423] Moreton Bay. J.D. Lang, p. 335, 336.
We read about the Kabi and Wakka tribes of Queensland: "A few
families claiming the same territory usually camped and travelled
together, sometimes in smaller, sometimes in larger numbers. I
characterize such family groups as communities."[424] And again:
"Such communities were constituted by a few families occupying the
same small area in common."[425] This is a clear definition of what
we called local group, and agrees perfectly well with the general
picture already outlined.
[424] J. Mathew, i. p. 128.
[425] J. Mathew, i. p. 129.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account