The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the DominionColquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
History
The Fathers of Confederation: A Chronicle of the Birth of the Dominion
Colquhoun, A. H. U. (Arthur Hugh Urquhart)
Canada -- History -- 1841-1867
These were warm words, designed to rally a divided party. In due time
the tireless energy of the speaker and his friends reawakened the
fighting strength of their followers. For the moment, however, a
considerable number of {143} Liberals were disposed to give the new
conditions a trial. Howland and McDougall were invited to address the
convention, and they put their case in temperate and dignified
language. Howland pointed out that in the new ministry there would be
several Liberals from the lower provinces, and these men had requested
their Ontario friends not to leave them. McDougall's address was
especially apt and convincing:
We think that the work of coalition is not done, but only begun. We
think that British Columbia should be brought into the confederacy,
that the great north-western territory should be brought in, that
Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland should be brought in. I say that
the negotiations of the terms upon which these provinces are to be
brought in are important, and that it is as necessary that the
government in power should not be obliged to fight from day to day for
its political existence, as when Confederation was carried up to the
point we have now reached.... I think the coalition ought not to cease
until the work begun under Mr Brown's auspices is ended.
{144}
It was evident from these remarks that the arguments--what his critics
called the blandishments--of Macdonald had prevailed.
The first Cabinet, which was announced on July 1, began on a non-party
basis. This commended it to moderate men generally. But the task of
getting it together had been herculean. To secure a ministry
representative of all parts of the country seemed a reasonable policy
at the beginning. With time this has grown into an unwritten
convention of the constitution which cannot be ignored. In 1867 the
Cabinet representation had to be determined by geography, race, creed,
and party. None but an old parliamentary hand could have made the
attempt successfully. Ontario claimed and was assigned five ministers,
Quebec four, and the Maritime Provinces four. So much for geography.
Then came race and creed. It was found necessary to give the Irish
Catholics and the English minority in Quebec each a minister. The
French demanded and were granted three ministers. Finally, the fusion
of parties imposed another difficulty upon the cabinet-maker. He could
not find room for all the really deserving. There were thirteen
ministers--too many, {145} thought Brown and the _Globe_--and of these
six were Liberal and six Conservative, while Kenny of Nova Scotia had
once been a Liberal but had lately acted with the Tupper party. The
surprises were the absence of the names of McGee and Tupper from the
list. To have selected McGee as the Irish Catholic minister meant five
representatives for Quebec, and Ontario would not consent. This
threatened a deadlock, and Macdonald was about to advise the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account