The charm, the fetish and the relic represent ascending grades of
belief. They are all associated together in what we call _fetishism_.
The charm operates not by reason of any intelligence within itself but
by some influence from without. The horseshoe is such a charm. One of
the numerous African charms is the string which a mother ties around the
waist of her child and which is worn throughout childhood. This fetish
is for health. The Roman Catholic priests, in the early history of their
missions on the Congo, substituted for this health-fetish a string made
from the fibres of a palm that had been blessed on Palm Sunday. There is
no evidence, however, that the substitution of the Roman fetish for the
African fetish resulted in any marked improvement in the health of the
natives.
A charm is not necessarily a physical object—like the amulet. In Africa,
as among the superstitious everywhere else, it may be a word or action,
a sign or symbol, a formula or incantation. To count the number of
persons present on certain occasions will cause the death of at least
one of them within the year. The utterance of the word _salt_ at the
wrong moment has been known to produce appalling consequences.
The fetish proper represents a more intelligible form of belief than the
charm or amulet. One common kind of fetish implies animism; that is,
that the various objects of nature have each a life analogous to that of
man to which their phenomena are due. This life is inseparable from the
object. The eagle’s talon, the wing feathers of any bird, the claw of
the leopard, the teeth of animals, and all those objects which are
associated with that which is desirable or that which is fearful are
valuable fetishes, because one may avail himself of the powers inherent
in such objects. The African sometimes says that the surf is in a nasty
temper; and when he uses this expression he is not speaking
figuratively. The wind talks to the forest, and the forest talks to the
wind. The tornado is often nothing more than a quarrel between mountain
and forest, lightning against wind; and, as one writer expresses it, we
ourselves may get hit with the bits. Not that they are angry at us, but
at each other, and we had best keep out of the way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account