The great destiny of man which Jesus discloses seems not only credible,
but even natural, in the light of man’s kinship with God and the
possibilities of human character. Instead of the poor African’s fear of
death and his degrading conception of the future life, Jesus sets before
him a hope that thrills his heart with joy. Man has many present faults
and frailties, but he does not belong to the present. He is not a
finality, but a possibility; a possibility to be realized only in the
perspective of an infinite future, in which death itself is but an
incident, the end of nothing worth while; and beyond it is the
consummation of all our hopes, a consummation which language becomes
rhapsody when it would describe.
Is it wonderful that this new conception of humanity should be morally
transforming? that, for instance, it should impress even the African
mind with the sanctity of human life?
Cannibalism disappears as soon as the Gospel becomes intelligible, and
long before they accept it as individuals. A war arose between two
villages, in a community where I had preached not more than a year, for
the people had recently come from the far interior where cannibalism was
commonly practiced. The town making the attack came on a very dark
night, intending to set fire to the other town, which only required that
the blaze be started in one place, the houses being so close that all
must burn together. They were led by two young men whom I knew. While
the rest of the party were hiding, these two, going forward, saturated
the thatch roof of the first house with kerosene, and were striking a
match, when the noise was heard by the man inside. He quietly arose,
moving stealthily as a cat, opened the door, and discovered the two
young men standing a few yards in front of him. He took deliberate aim
and fired twice. One man fell dead instantly; the other, frightfully
wounded, reached his friends, who put him in a canoe and took him back
to his town, where he died a few days later. I have said that one of the
two fell in the street. A few years ago they would have eagerly devoured
the body, both as a feast, and as a fetish protection against the enemy.
The fetish belief still remained strong as ever, but they revolted from
the practice; and having cut the body in pieces and boiled it, they
smeared the grease upon their foreheads and breasts, hoping that it
would thus avail for their protection. But they did not taste it. In
former times they would actually boast of eating an enemy; now these
same people are ashamed to confess it, and it is the most offensive
charge that one town can make against another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account