This is everywhere the sentiment of the truly civilized man. He may be
lazy but he still recognizes the dignity of labour. But the African
recognizes only the dignity of idleness and deems it the true badge of
superiority. Work is not so obnoxious to his laziness as it is to his
self-respect. It is the brand of inferiority. It is not _exertion_ that
he hates: he exerts himself in war and in hunting. It is when work
assumes the form of _service_ that it offends him. Manhood, he believes,
consists in self-assertion as contrasted with self-sacrifice. His ideal
is not to minister but to be ministered unto. Therefore work is
relegated to women, who are weaker and cannot resist the imposition.
It is only necessary to point out one more difference between Africa and
civilization; and in this last, it seems to me, we have before us the
difference that is really fundamental: it is _trustworthiness_.
Civilization depends upon this quality in men. To the entire social
structure of civilization each individual contributes strength or
weakness according to his trustworthiness. In New York it has sometimes
been found, upon investigation, that in the steel frame of certain high
buildings many of the rivet holes were filled with soap and putty
instead of rivets. In the same city not long ago, in the family of a
prominent physician, the maid who had the care of the children went
calling on a friend and found that in the friend’s home there was
scarlet fever. The maid considered only that she had already had scarlet
fever and was therefore safe from it. So she made the call, but she
carried the fever back to the physician’s home and his children died
from it. Such exceptions prove the rule, namely, that trustworthiness is
the social cement of civilization.
A Fang village of a hundred persons can hold together constituting a
society; but as soon as it grows to a group of about two hundred it goes
to pieces and forms new villages. The men of the smaller village are
more closely related, are brothers, and affection, a sentiment of
brotherhood, insures a certain amount of honesty in their mutual
relations. As the relationship widens this sentiment weakens and
distrust takes the place of confidence. And the worst of it is that they
distrust each other because they really know each other; because they
are _untrustworthy_. Distrust is the dissolution of society.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account