The Field Book: or, Sports and pastimes of the United Kingdom: compiled from the best authorities, ancient and modernMaxwell, W. H. (William Hamilton)
History
The Field Book: or, Sports and pastimes of the United Kingdom: compiled from the best authorities, ancient and modern
Maxwell, W. H. (William Hamilton)
Amusements -- Great Britain; Sports -- Dictionaries; Sports -- Great Britain
Sir John Sebright says, “a breed cannot be improved, or even continued
in the degree of perfection at which it has already arrived, but by
breeding from individuals, so selected as to correct each other’s
defects, and by a judicious combination of their different properties (a
position that I believe will not be denied); it follows that animals
must degenerate by being long bred from the same family, without the
intermixture of any other blood, or from being what is technically
called _bred in-and-in_.”
To Mr. Meynell’s opinion to the contrary, he replies—“Mr. Meynell’s
fox-hounds are quoted as an instance of the success of this practice (i.
e. _the in-and-in_); but, on speaking to that gentleman upon the
subject, I found that he did not attach the meaning that I do to the
term in-and-in. He said, that he frequently bred from the father and the
daughter, and the mother and the son. This is not what I consider as
breeding in-and-in; for the daughter is only half of the same blood as
the father, and will probably partake, in a great degree, of the
properties of the mother.” Again: “I have tried many experiments by
breeding in-and-in upon dogs, fowls, and pigeons; the dogs became, from
strong spaniels, weak and diminutive lap-dogs; the fowls became long in
the legs, small in the body, and bad breeders.”
Sir W. C——n, in his _Treatise on Greyhounds_, is unfavourable to
breeding a kin. He says, “If continued for some litters, a manifest
inferiority of size, and a deficiency of bone, will soon be visible, as
well as a want of courage and bottom; though the beauty of the form,
with the exception of the size, may not be diminished.”—_Blaine._—_Sir
John Sebright._
BRENT GOOSE (_Anas Bernicla_, LINN.; _Le Cravant_, BUFF.), _s._
[Illustration]
This is of nearly the same shape, but somewhat less than the Bean Goose,
from which it differs in the colour of its plumage, being mostly of a
uniform brown, the feathers edged with ash; the upper parts, breast and
neck, are darker than the belly, which is more mixed and dappled with
paler cinereous and gray: the head and upper half of the neck are black,
excepting a white patch on each side of the latter, near the throat: the
lower part of the back and rump are also black: the tail, quills, and
legs dusky: the bill is dark, rather of a narrow shape, and only about
an inch and a half long: the irides are light hazel. In the female and
the younger birds, the plumage is not so distinctly marked, and the
white spots on the sides of the neck are often mixed with dusky; but
such varyings are discernible in many other birds, for it seldom happens
that two are found exactly alike.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account