The Fight for the Republic in ChinaPutnam Weale, B. L. (Bertram Lenox)
History
The Fight for the Republic in China
Putnam Weale, B. L. (Bertram Lenox)
China -- History -- Republic, 1912-1949; China -- Politics and government
"In conclusion I wish to say that whenever a policy is adopted we
should carry out the complete scheme. If we should hesitate in the
middle and become afraid to go ahead we will soon find ourselves in
an embarrassing position. The Government and Parliament should
therefore stir up courage and boldly make the decision and take the
step."
Unanswerable as seem these arguments to the Western mind, they were by
no means so to the mass of Chinese who are always fearful lest some
sudden reshuffling in the relationships existing between foreign Powers
exposes them to new and greater calamities. This Chinese viewpoint, with
its ignorance of basic considerations, is well-illustrated by the Second
Memorandum, which follows. Written by the famous reformer of 1898 Kang
Yu-wei, it demonstrates how greatly the revolutionists of 1911 are in
advance of a school which was the vogue less than twenty years ago and
which is completely out of touch with the thought which the war has made
world-wide. Nevertheless the line of argument which characterizes this
utterance is still a political factor in China and must be understood.
MEMORANDUM
... "The breach between the United States and Germany is no concern
of ours. But the Government suddenly severed diplomatic relations
with Germany and is now contemplating entry into the war. This is to
advance beyond the action of the United States which continues to
observe neutrality. And if we analyse the public opinion of the
country, we find that all peoples--high and low, well-informed and
ignorant--betray great alarm when informed of the rupture and the
proposal to declare war on Germany, fearing that such a development
may cause grave peril to the country. This war-policy is being urged
by a handful of politicians, including a few members of Parliament
and several party men with the view of creating a diplomatic
situation to serve their political ends and to reap great profits.
"Their arguments are that China--by siding with the Entente--may
obtain large loans, the revision of the Customs Tariff and the
suspension of the Boxer indemnity to Germany, as well as the
recovery of the German concessions, mining and railroad rights and
the seizure of German commerce. Pray, how large is Germany's share
of the Boxer indemnity? Seeing that German commerce is protected by
international law, will China be able to seize it; and does she not
know that the Kaiser may in the future exact restitution?
PERILS OF WAR
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account