Boarding schools -- Juvenile fiction; Football stories; School sports -- Juvenile fiction; Teenage boys -- Juvenile fiction
The next evening Tom hurried through his supper and was almost
impatient with Clif because the latter, in spite of many honorable
wounds received in battle that afternoon, was hungry and insisted on
satisfying his appetite. When they got to Loring’s room that youth
was still eating, and Tom had to wait a good ten minutes while Loring
finished and Wattles removed the tray and the small table was placed
close to Loring’s chair. Then another battle began, and Clif selected
one of the books on football and fairly turned his back on the game.
This time, though, the contest was soon over, for Loring made a
fatal mistake soon after the start. As there was scarcely time for
another, the chessmen were put away, Clif returned the book he had
been reading to the shelf and they talked. Presently Tom asked to see
the collection of football diagrams of which Clif had told him and the
rest of the time was spent in discussing them. Tom was loud in his
praise of them, but he thought some of them not workable, and that led
to a three-cornered discussion during which the chess-board was again
produced and several plays were rehearsed. Tom proved his contention
with regard to one of them and Loring cheerfully crumpled a sheet of
paper up and tossed it into the waste-basket. Going back to West, Tom
confided to his companion that Loring Deane knew a lot of football and
that it was a plaguey shame he couldn’t get out and play like other
fellows.
By the last of that week going over to Loring’s after supper had become
a habit with Clif and Tom, and by Saturday evening the intimacy had
reached the point where the chums were calling Loring by his first name
and Loring was saying “Tom” and “Clif” quite naturally. Discussion of
the First Team’s defeat by Horner delayed the chess game that evening,
to Clif’s delight, and the subject was well thrashed out between them
before the board was set out on the little table. In an argument
between Tom and Loring on the subject of Stoddard’s choice of plays,
Loring, in Clif’s opinion, won conclusively.
“Well, maybe he made mistakes,” Tom conceded at last, “but he’s better
than Houston, isn’t he?”
“I think so,” answered Loring, “but neither of them is my idea of a
corking quarter. But then, I’m not keen on their style, anyway.”
“How do you mean, Loring?” Clif asked.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account