The Fijians: A Study of the Decay of CustomThomson, Basil
History
The Fijians: A Study of the Decay of Custom
Thomson, Basil
Ethnology -- Fiji; Fijians
From our preconceived ideas of the advantages of out-breeding we should
expect to find that the offspring of natives of different villages would
have shown, if not the highest fecundity, at least the highest vitality,
for this is the class in which the parents are not related. On the
contrary, we find that the families of these unrelated people are only
third in point of vitality.
In view of the unfavourable position which the "relations other than
concubitants" hold in this analysis, it is well to divide the group into
two sub-classes. Of the fifty-five families of "relations," thirty-three
are stated to be _kawa vata_ (_i.e._ of the same stock, but not
necessarily of the same family or generation). The remaining twenty-two
families, on the other hand, consist of such unions (incestuous from the
Fijian point of view) of _vei-nganeni_ or _vei-tathini_, that is to say,
brother and sister, or cousins not concubitant; _vei-vungoni_, uncle
and niece, or aunt and nephew; _vei-tamani_, father and daughter, or
paternal uncle and niece; and _vei-luveni_ or _vei-tinani_, maternal
aunt and nephew, or mother and son. We have therefore, for purposes of
identification, divided the group into--first, relations distant;
second, relations specified.
----------------------+------------+----------------------------------
| |
Divisions. | Number of | Children of the Marriage.
| Families. +----------------------------------
| | Alive. | Dead. | Total.
----------------------+------------+-------------+---------+----------
Relations (distant) | 33 | 49 | 61 | 110
Average per family | -- | 1·48 | 1·85 | 3·33
| | | |
Relations (specified) | 22 | 23 | 35 | 58
Average per family | -- | 1·05 | 1·59 | 2·64
----------------------+------------+-------------+---------+----------
Total | 55 | 72 | 96 | 168
----------------------+------------+-------------+---------+----------
Average per family | 1·31 | 1·75 | 3·6
----------------------+------------+-------------+---------+----------
The fecundity of these distant relations thus appears to be much higher
than that of the specified relations, and a little higher even than that
of the concubitants--the highest of the four groups. The comparative
figures are as follows--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account