Capitalists and financiers -- Fiction; Psychological fiction
The examination now came down to the matter of the particular check for
sixty thousand dollars which Albert Stires had handed Cowperwood on the
afternoon—late—of October 9, 1871. Shannon showed Stener the check
itself. Had he ever seen it? Yes. Where? In the office of District
Attorney Pettie on October 20th, or thereabouts last. Was that the
first time he had seen it? Yes. Had he ever heard about it before then?
Yes. When? On October 10th last. Would he kindly tell the jury in his
own way just how and under what circumstances he first heard of it
then? Stener twisted uncomfortably in his chair. It was a hard thing to
do. It was not a pleasant commentary on his own character and degree of
moral stamina, to say the least. However, he cleared his throat again
and began a description of that small but bitter section of his life’s
drama in which Cowperwood, finding himself in a tight place and about
to fail, had come to him at his office and demanded that he loan him
three hundred thousand dollars more in one lump sum.
There was considerable bickering just at this point between Steger and
Shannon, for the former was very anxious to make it appear that Stener
was lying out of the whole cloth about this. Steger got in his
objection at this point, and created a considerable diversion from the
main theme, because Stener kept saying he “thought” or he “believed.”
“Object!” shouted Steger, repeatedly. “I move that that be stricken
from the record as incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. The witness
is not allowed to say what he thinks, and the prosecution knows it very
well.”
“Your honor,” insisted Shannon, “I am doing the best I can to have the
witness tell a plain, straightforward story, and I think that it is
obvious that he is doing so.”
“Object!” reiterated Steger, vociferously. “Your honor, I insist that
the district attorney has no right to prejudice the minds of the jury
by flattering estimates of the sincerity of the witness. What he thinks
of the witness and his sincerity is of no importance in this case. I
must ask that your honor caution him plainly in this matter.”
“Objection sustained,” declared Judge Payderson, “the prosecution will
please be more explicit”; and Shannon went on with his case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account