Capitalists and financiers -- Fiction; Psychological fiction
Were his relations with the city treasurer as broker and agent the same
as they had always been on the day that he secured this particular
check for sixty thousand dollars, or were they not? Had they been
terminated by a conversation fifteen minutes before or two days before
or two weeks before—it makes no difference when, so long as they had
been properly terminated—or had they not? A business man has a right to
abrogate an agreement at any time where there is no specific form of
contract and no fixed period of operation entered into—as you all must
know. You must not forget that in considering the evidence in this
case. Did George W. Stener, knowing or suspecting that Frank A.
Cowperwood was in a tight place financially, unable to fulfill any
longer properly and honestly the duties supposedly devolving on him by
this agreement, terminate it then and there on October 9, 1871, before
this check for sixty thousand dollars was given, or did he not? Did Mr.
Frank A. Cowperwood then and there, knowing that he was no longer an
agent of the city treasurer and the city, and knowing also that he was
insolvent (having, as Mr. Stener contends, admitted to him that he was
so), and having no intention of placing the certificates which he
subsequently declared he had purchased in the sinking-fund, go out into
Mr. Stener’s general office, meet his secretary, tell him he had
purchased sixty thousand dollars’ worth of city loan, ask for the
check, get it, put it in his pocket, walk off, and never make any
return of any kind in any manner, shape, or form to the city, and then,
subsequently, twenty-four hours later, fail, owing this and five
hundred thousand dollars more to the city treasury, or did he not? What
are the facts in this case? What have the witnesses testified to? What
has George W. Stener testified to, Albert Stires, President Davison,
Mr. Cowperwood himself? What are the interesting, subtle facts in this
case, anyhow? Gentlemen, you have a very curious problem to decide.”
He paused and gazed at the jury, adjusting his sleeves as he did so,
and looking as though he knew for certain that he was on the trail of a
slippery, elusive criminal who was in a fair way to foist himself upon
an honorable and decent community and an honorable and innocent jury as
an honest man.
Then he continued:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account