The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their worksFairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy
The first philosophers of Greece : $b An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works
Fairbanks, Arthur
Philosophy, Ancient
§ 4. In addition to these quotations we find in the writings of Aristotle
a comparatively full statement of the opinions of the pre-Sokratic
philosophers. Aristotle was interested in the work of his predecessors,
since he rightly regarded his own system as the crowning result of
partial views that had been set forth before. All that is valuable in
their work he would give its place in his own philosophy, and their false
or partial opinions he would controvert. Accordingly his ordinary method
is to commence the discussion of a theme by stating the opinions of his
predecessors and criticising them; and it is natural that the early
thinkers who first set forth characteristic views with force and vigour
should receive the fullest consideration, for indeed this position is
still due to them in the history of philosophy.
Inasmuch as Aristotle set the fashion for later philosophic writers
in collecting and criticising the opinions of earlier thinkers, it is
important to form a clear conception of both the excellence and the
defects of his method.
On a first examination of his statements of these opinions the student
is struck by their fullness and comparative accuracy. Emminger[108] has
collected and discussed these data, and arrives at the conclusion in
every instance that Aristotle’s statement is based on a use of the best
materials at his command, and that it reproduces correctly the view of
the philosopher in question. It is true that Emminger takes the position
of an apologist. There is no doubt, however, that Aristotle was very
familiar with the poems of Empedokles, the arguments of Zeno, the system
of the Pythagoreans; when he cannot verify his opinions, as in the case
of Thales, they are commonly introduced with a λέγεται of caution;
and where the views of earlier thinkers seem to be distorted, it is
generally due to one of several simple causes which we can estimate with
considerable accuracy.
My own conclusion is that the data given by Aristotle are of the greatest
value for the study of his predecessors, though they are to be used with
caution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account